David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Idealistic Studies 32 (2):121-142 (2002)
I show one reason why Hegel’s theory of history is an improvement over Kant’s. There is an ambiguity in Kant’s theory of history. He wants, on the one hand, to distinguish empirical history (and, by extension, other empirical sciences which constitute experience) from reason’s a priori regulative role in theory. On the other hand, his view of the nature of sciences and the role of reason precludes such a separation. I trace this problem to different roles assigned the faculties of understanding and reason in our experience. In Hegel’s theory of history, both reason and understanding together constitute the sciences, and thus experience. Hegel argues that history is a unified field employing both understanding and reason. I conclude that the more consistent theory of history for idealists is Hegel’s, and that this consistency partially explains the movement in German Idealism from Kantian to Hegelian thought
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Redding (2010-11). Hegel's Anticipation of the Early History of Analytic Philosophy. The Owl of Minerva 42 (1–2):18–40.
John H. Zammito (2003). 'This Inscrutable Principle of an Original Organization': Epigenesis and 'Looseness of Fit' in Kant's Philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):73-109.
Simon Lumsden (2003). Satisfying the Demands of Reason: Hegel's Conceptualization of Experience. Topoi 22 (1):41-53.
James R. O'Shea (1997). The Needs of Understanding: Kant on Empirical Laws and Regulative Ideals. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (2):216 – 254.
Scott Jenkins (2011). Hegel on Space: A Critique of Kant's Transcendental Philosophy. Inquiry 53 (4):326-355.
Jon Stewart (2010/2012). Idealism and Existentialism: Hegel and Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Continuum.
Joe McCarney (2000). Hegel on History. Routledge.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1993). Hegel, Idealism, and Robert Pippin. International Philosophical Quarterly 33 (3):263-272.
Stephen Priest (ed.) (1987). Hegel's Critique of Kant. Oxford University Press.
Andrew Buchwalter (2012/2011). Dialectics, Politics, and the Contemporary Value of Hegel's Practical Philosophy. Routledge.
John Hund (1998). Hegel's Break with Kant: The Leap From Individual Psychology to Sociology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (2):226-243.
John H. McClendon (2005). C.L.R. James's Notes on Dialectics: Left Hegelianism or Marxism-Leninism? Lexington Books.
William F. Bristow (2007). Hegel and the Transformation of Philosophical Critique. Oxford University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads4 ( #258,599 of 1,102,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,523 of 1,102,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?