David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Continental Philosophy Review 36 (1):27-43 (2003)
Foucault notoriously suggests that his historical analyses are fictions. Commentators typically interpret this claim in a negative light to mean that Foucault's works are not, strictly speaking, true. In this paper, I present a positive interpretation of Foucault's claim, basing my argument on a hitherto marginalized aspect of his work: the experience-book. An experience-book is defined as a use of fiction in the practice of critique with desubjectifying effects. My argument for this interpretation proceeds in three steps. First, to prepare a preliminary account of Foucault's concept of fiction and its effects, I look at Blanchot's ontological interpretation of the work of literature in The Space of Literature. Blanchot, I suggest, provides a template for understanding Foucault's concept of the experience-book. Second, I identify traces of Blanchot's concept of fiction in Foucault's study of Jules Verne, Behind the Fable. I argue that Foucault's critique of fiction, in this paper, anticipates and prefigures his later use of fiction in the practice of critique. Third, pursuing this intuition, I develop an interpretation of Discipline and Punish understood as a use of fiction and experience-book. This interpretation provides a new, immanent perspective on Foucault's critique, and mitigates the epistemological skepticism of the claim that his works are fictions
|Keywords||Philosophy Phenomenology Philosophy of Man Political Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Timothy O’Leary (2008). Foucault's Turn From Literature. Continental Philosophy Review 41 (1):89-110.
Similar books and articles
Benjamin S. Pryor (2011). On the “Perfect Time of Human Experience”. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (1):65-78.
Ferda Keskin (2007). Foucault's Kantian Legacy. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 11:97-107.
Linda Alcoff (1996). Dangerous Pleasures: Foucault and the Politics of Pedophilia. In Susan Hekman (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Foucault. Pennsylvania State Press.
Jeremy R. Carrette (2000). Foucault and Religion: Spiritual Corporality and Political Spirituality. Routledge.
Colin Koopman (2010). Revising Foucault: The History and Critique of Modernity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (5):545-565.
Leonard Lawlor (2005). Un Ecart Infime (Part I): Foucault's Critique of the Concept of Lived-Experience ( Vécu). Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):11-28.
Johanna Oksala (2011). Sexual Experience: Foucault, Phenomenology, and Feminist Theory. Hypatia 26 (1):207-223.
Timothy Rayner (2004). On Questioning Being: Foucault's Heideggerian Turn. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (4):419 – 438.
Added to index2010-04-19
Total downloads19 ( #98,815 of 1,413,400 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #154,345 of 1,413,400 )
How can I increase my downloads?