|Abstract||The paper upholds the legislative fallacy of allowing children to work in family establishment as compared to the factory prohibitions. The discrepancy in the definition of child in the Labour laws and the ambit of prohibition of child labour is discussed in this paper. The paper also analyses the benchmark of the age in which the child should be allowed to work under the various provisions of the different legislations and the reasons of legislative anomaly on the certification of fitness of a child. The scope of this paper is to study the various industrial legislations and critically study the provisions against child labour and thereby bring forth the enhancement or the detrimental tactics of the legislative intent in ensuring social security to the weaker section of the society.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Roland Pierik (2004). Child Labor Abroad: Five Policy Options. Philosophy & Public Policy Quarterly 24 (3):9-13.
Henry Laycock (1999). Exploitation Via Labour Power in Marx. Journal of Ethics 3 (2):121--131.
Roland Pierik & Mijke Houwerzijl (2006). Western Policies on Child Labor Abroad. Ethics and International Affairs 20 (2):193–218.
Vicente Sebastian (1997). Child Labour. Business Ethics 6 (4):208–212.
Jonathan Todres, Birth Registration: An Essential First Step Toward Ensuring the Rights of All Children.
E. Francesconi & A. Passerini (2007). Automatic Classification of Provisions in Legislative Texts. Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (1):1-17.
Carol van Nijnatten (2010). Children's Agency, Children's Welfare: A Dialogical Approach to Child Development, Policy and Practice. Policy Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #274,982 of 549,224 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,224 )
How can I increase my downloads?