Ontological commitment

Philosophy Compass 2 (3):428–444 (2007)
I propose a way of thinking aboout content, and a related way of thinking about ontological commitment. (This is part of a series of four closely related papers. The other three are ‘On Specifying Truth-Conditions’, ‘An Actualist’s Guide to Quantifying In’ and ‘An Account of Possibility’.).
Keywords commitment   mathematics   platonism   nominalism   toread
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA
    Ross P. Cameron (2010). Necessity and Triviality. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):401-415.
    Luca Moretti & Huw Price (2008). Introduction. Philosophical Studies 141 (1):1 - 5.

    View all 8 citations

    Similar books and articles

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    101 ( #8,753 of 1,088,428 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    7 ( #15,229 of 1,088,428 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  is 1 thread in this forum
    Cross-posted from http://mleseminar.wordpress.com/


    Agustín Rayo - Ontological Commitment

    Paper here; handout here.

    We struggled to see the exact import of this paper. Cian worried that ‘ontological commitment’ was a philosophical technical term, and that even a really good account of it would still not tell us too much about what really exists. Perhaps the motivation is that Rayo wants to emphasize that the characterization of ontological commitment can be kept apart from Quine’s criterion. Quine’s criterion (to be is to be the value of a variable) has perhaps come to seem constitutive of ontological commitment for some philosophers, which leaves no room for non-Quinean accounts of the ontology of (say) mathematics.

    I wondered about an attempt at explaining demand-talk in terms of necessitation. The obvious account, that the truth of P demands that the world contains F iff necessarily(p → Fs exist), ends up saying that asserting any true proposition commits us to the existence of all ne ... (read more)