In Martin P. Golding & William A. Edmundson (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Blackwell Pub. (2005)
|Abstract||The paper deals with the possibility of a theory of the nature of law as such, a theory which will be necessarily true of all law. It explores the relations between explanations of concepts and of the things they are concepts of, the possibility that the law has essential properties, and the possibility that the law changes its nature over time, and that what is law at a given place and time depends on the culture and concepts of that place and time. It also considers the possibility of understanding the institutions, such as the law, of cultures whose concepts are alien to us. The position advocated offers a reconciliation of ways in which a theory of the nature of law is parochial with its claim to be universal.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gerald J. Postema (1986). Bentham and the Common Law Tradition. Oxford University Press.
Joseph Raz (2003). About Morality and the Nature of Law. American Journal of Jurisprudence 48:1-15.
Frederick Schauer (2010). Was Austin Right After All? On the Role of Sanctions in a Theory of Law. Ratio Juris 23 (1):1-21.
Joseph Raz (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press.
Paula Gaido (2011). The Purpose of Legal Theory: Some Problems with Joseph Raz's View. Law and Philosophy 30 (6):685-698.
Kenneth M. Ehrenberg (2009). Defending the Possibility of a Neutral Functional Theory of Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29:91.
Joseph Raz (2009). Between Authority and Interpretation: On the Theory of Law and Practical Reason. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads141 ( #2,953 of 549,093 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,263 of 549,093 )
How can I increase my downloads?