Graduate studies at Western
In J. Tasioulas & S. Besson (eds.), The Philosphy of International Law. Oxford University Press (2010)
|Abstract||Using the accounts of Gewirth and Griffin as examples, the article criticises accounts of human rights as those are understood in human rights practices, which regard them as rights all human beings have in virtue of their humanity. Instead it suggests that (with Rawls) human rights set the limits to the sovereignty of the state, but criticises Rawls conflation of sovereignty with legitimate authority. The resulting conception takes human rights, like other rights, to be contingent on social conditions, and in particular on the nature of the international system.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Edwards (2006). Rights: Foundations, Contents, Hierarchy. Res Publica 12 (3):277-293.
Christine Chwaszcza (2010). The Concept of Rights in Contemporary Human Rights Discourse. Ratio Juris 23 (3):333-364.
Jeremy Bendik-Keymer (2005). Common Humanity and Human Rights. Social Philosophy Today 21:51-62.
Doris Schroeder (2012). Human Rights and Human Dignity. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (3):323-335.
John Mahoney (2007). The Challenge of Human Rights: Origin, Development, and Significance. Blackwell Pub..
Mayra Gómez (2003). Human Rights in Cuba, El Salvador, and Nicaragua: A Sociological Perspective on Human Rights Abuse. Routledge.
W. J. Talbott (2010). Human Rights and Human Well-Being. Oxford University Press.
John Tasioulas (2009). Are Human Rights Essentially Triggers for Intervention? Philosophy Compass 4 (6):938-950.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads442 ( #205 of 750,480 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #8,303 of 750,480 )
How can I increase my downloads?