David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
MIT Press (2000)
Among the entities that can be mentally or linguistically represented are mental and linguistic representations themselves. That is, we can think and talk about speech and thought. This phenomenon is known as metarepresentation. An example is "Authors believe that people read books." -/- In this book François Recanati discusses the structure of metarepresentation from a variety of perspectives. According to him, metarepresentations have a dual structure: their content includes the content of the object-representation (people reading books) as well as the "meta" part (the authors' belief). Rejecting the view that the object representation is mentioned rather than used, Recanati claims that since metarepresentations carry the content of the object representation, they must be about whatever the object representation is about. Metarepresentations are fundamentally transparent because they work by simulating the representation they are about. -/- Topics covered in this wide-ranging work include the analysis of belief reports and talk about fiction, world shifting, opacity and substitutivity, quotation, the relation between direct and indirect discourse, context shifting, semantic pretense, and deference in language and thought.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$7.75 direct from Amazon $24.97 new Amazon page|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Dan Sperber (2011). Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
Jonathan Cohen & Eliot Michaelson (2013). Indexicality and The Answering Machine Paradox. Philosophy Compass 8 (6):580-592.
Joëlle Proust (2007). Metacognition and Metarepresentation: Is a Self-Directed Theory of Mind a Precondition for Metacognition? [REVIEW] Synthese 159 (2):271 - 295.
Andreas Stokke (2013). Protagonist Projection. Mind and Language 28 (2):204-232.
Tobias Rosefeldt (2008). 'That'-Clauses and Non-Nominal Quantification. Philosophical Studies 137 (3):301 - 333.
Similar books and articles
J. T. Muir (1930). Oratio Obliqua – Future Perfect Indicative in Conditional Clauses in Primary Sequence. The Classical Review 44 (01):12-.
M. Andrewes (1951). The Function of Tense Variation in the Subjunctive Mood of Oratio Obliqua. The Classical Review 1 (3-4):142-146.
A. N. Prior & A. Kenny (1963). Symposium: Oratio Obliqua. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 37:115 - 146.
J. P. Postgate (1905). Repraesentatio Temporum in the Oratio Obliqua of Caesar. The Classical Review 19 (09):441-446.
E. T. Salmon (1931). A Note on Subordinate Clauses in Oratio Obliqua. The Classical Review 45 (05):173-.
Dorothy Tarrant (1955). Plato's Use of Extended Oratio Obliqua. Classical Quarterly 5 (3-4):222-.
Kirk Ludwig (2003). François Recanati's Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):481 - 488.
T. Kapitan (2002). Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta: An Essay on Metarepresentation. Philosophical Review 111 (3):459-462.
Kirk Ludwig (2003). François Recanati's Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta: An Essay on Metarepresentation. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):481–488.
Added to index2009-05-13
Total downloads7 ( #445,243 of 1,934,966 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #196,593 of 1,934,966 )
How can I increase my downloads?