David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):90-97 (1999)
This paper responds to Swinburne’s recent article “Dualism Intact,” which defends his argument for a body/soul dualism. It pays particular attention to his defense against the charges of Alston and Smythe, especially the appeal to the “quasi-Aristotelian assumption,” on which the essence of a thing is necessary to its being the thing that it is. I argue that this defense does not save the argument, but only makes clear that its apparent plausibility rests on an ambiguity between two understandings of the nature of logical possibility. Swinburne’s argument draws on and requires both understandings at different points in his argument, but the two are incompatible at the key point
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
William P. Alston & Thomas W. Smythe (1994). Swinburne's Argument for Dualism. Faith and Philosophy 11 (1):127-33.
William Hasker (1998). Swinburne's Modal Argument for Dualism. Faith and Philosophy 15 (3):366-370.
Eleonore Stump & Norman Kretzmann (1996). An Objection to Swinburne's Argument for Dualism. Faith and Philosophy 13 (3):405-412.
Agnieszka Rostalska & Rafal Urbaniak (2009). Swinburne's Modal Argument for the Existence of a Soul. Philo 12 (1):73-87.
Rafal Urbaniak & Agnieszka Rostalska (2009). Swinburne's Modal Argument for the Existence of the Soul. Philo 12 (1):73-88.
Richard Swinburne (1996). Dualism Intact. Faith and Philosophy 13 (1):68 - 77.
Thomas W. Smythe (1994). Swinburne's Argument for Dualism. Faith and Philosophy 11 (1):127-133.
Karol Polcyn (2006). Conceivability, Possibility, and a Posteriori Necessity: On Chalmers' Argument for Dualism. Diametros 7 (March):37-55.
M. Pakaluk (2003). Degrees of Separation in the "Phaedo". Phronesis 48 (2):89 - 115.
Michael Pakaluk (2003). Degrees of Separation in the Phaedo. Phronesis 48 (2):89-115.
Jeremy Gwiazda (2009). Richard Swinburne, 'The Existence of God'. Sophia 48 (4):393 - 398.
Jeremy Gwiazda (2010). Richard Swinburne, the Existence of God, and Exact Numerical Values. Philosophia 38 (2):357-363.
Jason T. Eberl (2010). Varieties of Dualism. International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (1):39-56.
Keith E. Yandell (1995). A Defense of Dualism. Faith and Philosophy 12 (4):548-566.
Richard Swinburne (1997). The Modal Argument for Substance Dualism. In The Evolution of the Soul. (Revised Edition).
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads12 ( #145,286 of 1,410,530 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #178,988 of 1,410,530 )
How can I increase my downloads?