|Abstract||In this essay I examine the Rational Theory of Addiction proposed by Becker and Murphy in 1988. Their theory is an extension of rational choice theory to explain and predict aspects of addiction. Becker and Murphy conceive of addiction as a process of deciding to use (or abstaining from use) based on a rationally well-informed decision that consumption (or non-consumption of) the drug will maximize benefit over costs. I propose formal diagnostic conditions for the term 'addict' according to RTA. I then show how the theory has explanatory deficits in differentiating between two kinds of addicts (willing and unwilling addicts).|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Andrew M. Yuengert (2006). Model Selection and Multiple Research Goals: The Case of Rational Addiction. Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (1):77-96.
Bennett Foddy (2011). Addicted to Food, Hungry for Drugs. Neuroethics 4 (2):79-89.
Helen Keane (2004). Disorders of Desire: Addiction and Problems of Intimacy. Journal of Medical Humanities 25 (3):189-204.
Ole Rogeberg & Hans Olav Melberg (2011). Acceptance of Unsupported Claims About Reality: A Blind Spot in Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 18 (01):29-52.
Dennis Chong (1995). Rational Choice Theory's Mysterious Rivals. Critical Review 9 (1-2):37-57.
Edmund Henden (forthcoming). Heroin Addiction and Voluntary Choice: The Case of Informed Consent. Bioethics.
Ross (ed.) (2010). What Is Addiction? The MIT Press.
R. Jay Wallace (1999). Addiction as Defect of the Will: Some Philosophical Reflections. Law and Philosophy 18 (6):621–654.
Darin Weinberg (1997). Lindesmith on Addiction: A Critical History of a Classic Theory. Sociological Theory 15 (2):150-161.
Added to index2009-03-19
Total downloads12 ( #93,408 of 549,124 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,124 )
How can I increase my downloads?