Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 17 (11):1205-1210 (1998)
|Abstract||When a person engages in a "game," that person may reason and behave in a manner that is inconsistent with non-game-situation moral reasoning. In this study we measured moral reasoning with the Defining Issues Test (DIT). We then engaged the students in a competitive game and collected accounts of their "reasoning" by having them explain their decisions with a forced choice inventory. The results indicate that there were significant inconsistencies in moral reasoning between non-game and game situations. The implications of this for business ethics are discussed.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gilbert Harman, Kelby Mason & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (2010). Moral Reasoning. In John Michael Doris (ed.), The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press.
James Weber & Sharon Green (1991). Principled Moral Reasoning: Is It a Viable Approach to Promote Ethical Integrity? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 10 (5):325 - 333.
Daryl Koehn (1997). Business and Game-Playing: The False Analogy. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1447-1452.
Mark Colyvan (2008). Relative Expectation Theory. Journal of Philosophy 105 (1):37-44.
Giacomo Bonanno (2002). Modal Logic and Game Theory: Two Alternative Approaches. Risk Decision and Policy 7:309-324.
Lothar Philipps (1993). Artificial Morality and Artificial Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (1):51-63.
B. Verbeek (2002). Game Theory and Moral Norms. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):337-352.
Melvin Fitting (2011). Reasoning About Games. Studia Logica 99 (1-3):143-169.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #154,860 of 739,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?