David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 17 (11):1205-1210 (1998)
When a person engages in a "game," that person may reason and behave in a manner that is inconsistent with non-game-situation moral reasoning. In this study we measured moral reasoning with the Defining Issues Test (DIT). We then engaged the students in a competitive game and collected accounts of their "reasoning" by having them explain their decisions with a forced choice inventory. The results indicate that there were significant inconsistencies in moral reasoning between non-game and game situations. The implications of this for business ethics are discussed.
|Keywords||Philosophy Ethics Business Education Economic Growth Management|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael D. Mumford, Lynn D. Devenport, Ryan P. Brown, Shane Connelly, Stephen T. Murphy, Jason H. Hill & Alison L. Antes (2006). Articles: Validation of Ethical Decision Making Measures: Evidence for a New Set of Measures. Ethics and Behavior 16 (4):319 – 345.
Patricia M. King & Matthew J. Mayhew (2002). Moral Judgement Development in Higher Education: Insights From the Defining Issues Test. Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):247-270.
Peter Lloyd & Ibo van de Poel (2008). Designing Games to Teach Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):433-447.
James M. Bloodgood, William H. Turnley & Peter E. Mudrack (2010). Ethics Instruction and the Perceived Acceptability of Cheating. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (1):23 - 37.
Carmel Herington & Scott Weaven (2008). Improving Consistency for Dit Results Using Cluster Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 80 (3):499 - 514.
Similar books and articles
Gilbert Harman, Kelby Mason & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (2010). Moral Reasoning. In John Michael Doris (ed.), The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press
James Weber & Sharon Green (1991). Principled Moral Reasoning: Is It a Viable Approach to Promote Ethical Integrity? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 10 (5):325 - 333.
Daryl Koehn (1997). Business and Game-Playing: The False Analogy. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1447-1452.
Mark Colyvan (2008). Relative Expectation Theory. Journal of Philosophy 105 (1):37-44.
Giacomo Bonanno (2002). Modal Logic and Game Theory: Two Alternative Approaches. Risk Decision and Policy 7:309-324.
Lothar Philipps (1993). Artificial Morality and Artificial Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (1):51-63.
B. Verbeek (2002). Game Theory and Moral Norms. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):337-352.
Melvin Fitting (2011). Reasoning About Games. Studia Logica 99 (1-3):143-169.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #205,678 of 1,939,000 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,475 of 1,939,000 )
How can I increase my downloads?