David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (2):150–167 (2007)
In this article I argue that the subject‐object distinction, operative in Continental Europe during the late‐1700s and early‐1800s, led to the religion‐secular distinction in higher education in the United States. Many scholars believe the origins of the shifting nature of the religion‐secular distinction resided with some form of influence that students from the United States encountered while they pursued advanced academic work in Germany. These scholars studied this influence at an institutional or organizational level. An intellectual approach to history would assess the metaphysical currents of idealism that proved to be the primary influence that students from the United States encountered during their time in Germany. While idealism would never fully take hold in the United States, it gave shape and direction to the emerging movement of pragmatism. As a result, the separation of subject and object, under the guise of pragmatism, is reified in the religion‐secular distinction in the academy in the United States. Once religion becomes the object of a subject, the subject's sense of self‐dependence forces the religion‐secular distinction. However, the religion‐secular distinction proves to be a transitory relationship. Inevitably, the underlying issue proves to be that only the secular can serve as the sustainable object of its subject
|Keywords||pragmatism German idealism religion‐secular subject‐object higher education|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
H. G. Callaway (1996). Schelling and the Background of American Pragmatism:. [REVIEW] Arisbe, Peirce-Related Papers 1:1-12.
William Desmond, Ernst-Otto Jan Onnasch & Paul Cruysberghs (eds.) (2004). Philosophy and Religion in German Idealism. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Paul W. Franks (2005). All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism. Harvard University Press.
Peter Koslowski (ed.) (2005). The Discovery of Historicity in German Idealism and Historism. Springer.
Charlene Haddock Seigfried (1993). Shared Communities of Interest: Feminism and Pragmatism. Hypatia 8 (2):1 - 14.
William Sweet (2012). British Idealism and its Empire. Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 17 (1):7-36.
Karl Ameriks (ed.) (2000). The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #230,243 of 1,410,134 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,743 of 1,410,134 )
How can I increase my downloads?