David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (2):63-64 (2003)
Bioethics should update its conception of the geneThe 25th of April marks the 50th anniversary of the publication in Nature of the letter by James Watson and Francis Crick announcing their solution to the structure of deoxyribose nucleic acid .1 By that time, much was known about the role of chromosomes in inheritance, the contribution of DNA to chromosome structure, and the chemistry of DNA.2 The gene concept itself was also well established by then; the principal scientific problem became to specify what genes were in molecular terms and how they functioned in the cell during ordinary function and cell division.The importance of the solution of the structure of DNA was twofold. First, it gave insight into finding a mechanism for DNA replication, as the authors recognised in this famous sentence:"It has not escaped our notice that the specific pairing we have postulated immediately suggests a copying mechanism for the genetic material.3 … "
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Maureen O'Malley, Jane Calvert & John Dupré (2007). The Study of Socioethical Issues in Systems Biology. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (4):67-78.
Péter Kakuk (2008). Gene Concepts and Genethics: Beyond Exceptionalism. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):357-375.
Similar books and articles
Roman Frigg (2008). Models in Science. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A. Charles Catania (2000). Metaphors, Models, and Mathematics in the Science of Behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):94-95.
Stephan Hartmann & Roman Frigg (2006). Models in Science. In Ed Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford
Wills Jenkins (2005). Assessing Metaphors of Agency: Intervention, Perfection, and Care as Models of Environmental Practice. Environmental Ethics 27 (2):135-154.
Sahotra Sarkar (1992). Models of Reduction and Categories of Reductionism. Synthese 91 (3):167-94.
Christopher Southgate (2007). Crick, Watson, and the Double Helix. Zygon 42 (1):257-258.
D. Mitchell (1984). Genetic Prophecy: Beyond the Double Helix. Journal of Medical Ethics 10 (4):215-215.
Bernard S. Strauss (2004). Rosy and Jim: The Mystery of the Double Helix. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 47 (3):443-448.
Liebe F. Cavalieri (1981). The Double-Edged Helix: Science in the Real World. Columbia University Press.
David W. Shoemaker (2002). The Irrelevance/Incoherence of Non-Reductionism About Personal Identity. Philo 5 (2):143-160.
K. Steele & C. Werndl (2013). Climate Models, Calibration, and Confirmation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (3):609-635.
Sanford A. Lakoff (1980). Moral Responsibility and the "Galilean Imperative":A Double Image of the Double Helix: The Recombinant DNA Debate. Clifford Grobstein; Regulation of Scientific Inquiry: Social Concerns with Research. Keith M. Wulff; Recombinant DNA: Science, Ethics, and Politics. John Richards; The Recombinant DNA Debate. David A. Jackson, Stephen P. Stich; A Nation of Guinea Pigs: The Unknown Risks of Chemical Technology. Marshall S. Shapo; Limits of Scientific Inquiry. Gerald Holton, Robert S. Morrison. [REVIEW] Ethics 91 (1):100-.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads6 ( #466,500 of 1,907,383 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #466,442 of 1,907,383 )
How can I increase my downloads?