Oxford University Press (2002)
|Abstract||Philosophical naturalism, according to which philosophy is continuous with the natural sciences, has dominated the Western academy for well over a century, but Michael Rea claims that it is without rational foundation. Rea argues compellingly to the surprising conclusion that naturalists are committed to rejecting realism about material objects, materialism, and perhaps realism about other minds.|
|Buy the book||$33.49 used (40% off) $39.09 new (29% off) $44.87 direct from Amazon (19% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B828.2.R43 2002|
|ISBN(s)||0199247609 0199247617 9780199247608 9780199247615|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Evan Fales (2005). World Without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2):494-497.
Andrew Melnyk (2004). Review: World Without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism. [REVIEW] Mind 113 (451):575-581.
Paul Draper (2004). On the Nature of Naturalism. Philo 7 (2):146-155.
Marcin Miłkowski (2008). Definining Ontological Naturalism. In Alexander Hieke & Hannes Leitgeb (eds.), Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences. Papers of the 31st International Wittgenstein Symposium. Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.
Penelope Maddy (1995). Naturalism and Ontology. Philosophia Mathematica 3 (3):248-270.
Stewart Goetz (2010). Naturally Understanding Naturalism. Faith and Philosophy 27 (1):79-90.
Andrew Melnyk (2004). Rea on Naturalism. Philo 7 (2):131-137.
Michael Rea (2005). Naturalism and Ontology: A Replyto Dale Jacquette. Faith and Philosophy 22 (3):343-357.
Michael Rea (2004). Replies to Critics. Philo 7 (2):163-175.
Michael C. Rea (2005). Naturalism and Ontology. Faith and Philosophy 22 (3):343-357.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads47 ( #23,106 of 549,090 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,228 of 549,090 )
How can I increase my downloads?