Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (4):563-581 (2010)
|Abstract||This article combines findings from cognitive psychology on the role of processing fluency in truth judgments with epistemological theory on justification of belief. We first review evidence that repeated exposure to a statement increases the subjective ease with which that statement is processed. This increased processing fluency, in turn, increases the probability that the statement is judged to be true. The basic question discussed here is whether the use of processing fluency as a cue to truth is epistemically justified. In the present analysis, based on Bayes’ Theorem, we adopt the reliable-process account of justification presented by Goldman (1986) and show that fluency is a reliable cue to truth, under the assumption that the majority of statements one has been exposed to are true. In the final section, we broaden the scope of this analysis and discuss how processing fluency as a potentially universal cue to judged truth may contribute to cultural differences in commonsense beliefs|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christian Unkelbach (2010). The Epistemic Status of Processing Fluency as Source for Judgments of Truth. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (4):563-581.
R. Reber & N. Schwarz (1999). Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Judgments of Truth. Consciousness and Cognition 8 (3):338-342.
Rolf Reber, Norbert Schwarz & Piotr Winkielman (2004). Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review 8 (4):364-382.
Valerie Thompson & Kinga Morsanyi (2012). Analytic Thinking: Do You Feel Like It? Mind and Society 11 (1):93-105.
Rolf Reber & Norbert Schwarz (2001). The Hot Fringes of Consciousness: Perceptual Fluency and Affect. Consciousness and Emotion 2 (2):223-231.
Christian Unkelbach, Myriam Bayer, Hans Alves, Alex Koch & Christoph Stahl (2011). Fluency and Positivity as Possible Causes of the Truth Effect. Consciousness and Cognition 20 (3):594-602.
Siyun Liu, Xujin Zhang, Yi Ren & Qiong Yu (forthcoming). Processing Fluency of the Forms and Sounds of Chinese Characters. Consciousness and Cognition.
Rolf Reber (2002). Reasons for the Preference for Symmetry. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):415-416.
James Beebe (2007). Reliabilism and Antirealist Theories of Truth. Erkenntnis 66 (3):375 - 391.
Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (forthcoming). Truth as the Aim of Epistemic Justification. In Timothy Chan (ed.), The Aim of Belief. Oxford University Press.
Peter Goodyear & Maria Zenios (2007). Discussion, Collaborative Knowledge Work and Epistemic Fluency. British Journal of Educational Studies 55 (4):351 - 368.
William A. Roche (2010). Coherentism, Truth, and Witness Agreement. Acta Analytica 25 (2):243-257.
Ariel Cohen (1999). Generics, Frequency Adverbs, and Probability. Linguistics and Philosophy 22 (3):221-253.
Charles B. Cross (1999). Coherence and Truth Conducive Justification. Analysis 59 (263):186–193.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads7 ( #133,479 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?