David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 54 (2):147-175 (1987)
There are several interpretations of the argument structure of Darwin's Origin of Species, representing Covering-Law, Inference-to-the-Best-Explanation, and (more recently) Semantic models. I argue that while all three types of interpretation enjoy some textual support, none succeeds in capturing the overall strategy of the Origin, consistent with Darwin's claim that it is 'one long argument'. I provide detailed criticisms of all three current models, and then offer an alternative interpretation based on the view that there are three main argument strategies in the Origin, all supporting the 'causal efficacy' of Darwin's theory. This interpretation provides both a more unified treatment of the text, and some important implications concerning the relation between general philosophical models of scientific theory support and specific historical cases
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Richard A. Richards (1997). Darwin and the Inefficacy of Artificial Selection. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (1):75-97.
Susan G. Sterrett (2002). Darwin's Analogy Between Artificial and Natural Selection: How Does It Go? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 33 (1):151-168.
Peter Gildenhuys (2004). Darwin, Herschel, and the Role of Analogy in Darwin's Origin. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 35 (4):593-611.
Robert T. Pennock (1995). Moral Darwinism: Ethical Evidence for the Descent of Man. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 10 (3):287-307.
Bert Theunissen (2012). Darwin and His Pigeons. The Analogy Between Artificial and Natural Selection Revisited. Journal of the History of Biology 45 (2):179 - 212.
Similar books and articles
Richard Bellon (2006). Joseph Hooker Takes a "Fixed Post": Transmutation and the "Present Unsatisfactory State of Systematic Botany", 1844-1860. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 39 (1):1 - 39.
Michael Ruse & Robert J. Richards (eds.) (2009). The Cambridge Companion to the "Origin of Species". Cambridge University Press.
Elisabeth A. Lloyd (1983). The Nature of Darwin's Support for the Theory of Natural Selection. Philosophy of Science 50 (1):112-129.
Curtis N. Johnson (2007). The Preface to Darwin's Origin of Species: The Curious History of the "Historical Sketch". [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 40 (3):529 - 556.
M. J. S. Hodge (1992). Darwin's Argument in the Origin. Philosophy of Science 59 (3):461-464.
Matti Sintonen (1990). Darwin's Long and Short Arguments. Philosophy of Science 57 (4):677-689.
Charles Darwin (1975). Charles Darwin's Natural Selection: Being the Second Part of His Big Species Book Written From 1856 to 1858. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #160,118 of 1,911,681 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,010 of 1,911,681 )
How can I increase my downloads?