Erkenntnis 46 (1):49-67 (1997)
|Abstract||Brian Loar has argued that the well-known arguments against individualism in the philosophy of mind are insufficient because they rely on the assumption that that-clauses uniquely capture psychological content. He tried to show that this is not the use of that-clauses in philosophical psychology. I argue that he does not succeed in his argument. That-clauses sometimes capture psychological content, if our system of mental ascription is to be workable at all. I argue further that individualism tends to be at odds with a requirement of intersubjective shareability of contents and that Loar is alternative conception of psychological content is beset with difficulties|
|Keywords||Clause Content Individualism Individuation Metaphysics Mind Loar, B|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Derk Pereboom (1995). Conceptual Structure and the Individuation of Content. Philosophical Perspectives 9:401-428.
John I. Biro (1992). In Defense of Social Content. Philosophical Studies 67 (3):277-93.
Denis M. Walsh (1998). Wide Content Individualism. Mind 107 (427):625-652.
Martin Davies (1991). Individualism and Perceptual Content. Mind 100 (399):461-84.
Bryan Frances (1999). On the Explanatory Deficiencies of Linguistic Content. Philosophical Studies 93 (1):45-75.
Robert Stalnaker (1990). Narrow Content. In C. Anthony Anderson & Joseph Owens (eds.), Propositional Attitudes: The Role of Content in Logic, Language, and Mind. Stanford: Csli.
Frances Egan (1992). Individualism, Computation, and Perceptual Content. Mind 101 (403):443-59.
Gabriel Segal (1991). Defence of a Reasonable Individualism. Mind 100 (399):485-94.
Brian Loar (1988). Social Content and Psychological Content. In Robert H. Grimm & D. D. Merrill (eds.), Contents of Thought. University of Arizona Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #90,469 of 722,787 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,644 of 722,787 )
How can I increase my downloads?