Graduate studies at Western
Synthese 125 (3):341-383 (2000)
|Abstract||In recent philosophy of mathematics avariety of writers have presented ``structuralist''views and arguments. There are, however, a number ofsubstantive differences in what their proponents take``structuralism'' to be. In this paper we make explicitthese differences, as well as some underlyingsimilarities and common roots. We thus identifysystematically and in detail, several main variants ofstructuralism, including some not often recognized assuch. As a result the relations between thesevariants, and between the respective problems theyface, become manifest. Throughout our focus is onsemantic and metaphysical issues, including what is orcould be meant by ``structure'' in this connection.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Stathis Psillos (2006). The Structure, the Whole Structure, and Nothing but the Structure? Philosophy of Science 73 (5):560-570.
Simon Friederich (2010). Structuralism and Meta-Mathematics. Erkenntnis 73 (1):67 - 81.
Erich H. Reck (2003). Dedekind's Structuralism: An Interpretation and Partial Defense. Synthese 137 (3):369 - 419.
Saunders Lane (1996). Structure in Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 4 (2):174-183.
Jessica Carter (2008). Structuralism as a Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. Synthese 163 (2):119 - 131.
Jacob Busch (2003). What Structures Could Not Be. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (3):211 – 225.
Stewart Shapiro (2006). Structure and Identity. In Fraser MacBride (ed.), Identity and Modality. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #48,178 of 739,332 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,332 )
How can I increase my downloads?