The Enlightenment in American Law I: The Declaration of Independence

Review of Metaphysics 44 (3):549 - 573 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

THE ENLIGHTENMENT IS DISTINGUISHED from other periods of history by two major characteristics: 1) the widespread belief that it was superior morally and intellectually to all those periods which preceded it, and 2) the conviction that human faculties, reason or moral sense, are primarily responsible for this achievement. The Enlightenment was marked, furthermore, by radical change in the organization of society and by rapid progress in the applications of scientific technology to the production of goods and services. Since political and ecclesiastical authorities were challenged during the Enlightenment, revolutions, both democratic and industrial, have been its fruit. Inherited traditions and established institutions were often overthrown or overhauled in order to release the human energies, ideas, and values which promoted the erection of new institutions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Enlightenment in American Law II: The Constitution.Andrew J. Reck - 1991 - Review of Metaphysics 44 (4):729 - 754.
The contemporary significance of the american declaration of independence.John Somerville - 1978 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (4):489-504.
Is Kant a Moral Constructivist or a Moral Realist?Paul Formosa - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):170-196.
An environmental declaration of independence.Mark Bird - 1985 - World Futures 21 (3):219-230.
On declaring the laws and rights of nature.C. Bradley Thompson - 2012 - Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (2):104-138.
The Ibero-American enlightenment.Alfred Owen Aldridge (ed.) - 1971 - Urbana,: University of Illinois Press.
Internationalism and democracy.Mark F. Plattner - 2005 - Philosophy 80 (4):495-512.
Which rights should be universal?William Talbott - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
20 (#749,846)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references