David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 57 (3):459-478 (1990)
There are a number of reasons for doubting the standard view that scientific theories (understood as sets of connected statements) are the best units for investigating scientific continuity and change (that is, research programs continue as long as groups of scientists accept the central tenets of such theories). Here it is argued that one weakness of this approach is that it cannot be used to demarcate adequately scientific communities or conceptual systems (that is, it fails as a classificatory scheme). Recent alternative proposals by Philip Kitcher and David Hull are assessed in terms of their usefulness in demarcating "Darwinism" and the "Darwinians" in the first decade or so after the publication of The Origin of Species, focusing on the case of Charles Lyell
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Richard G. Delisle (2011). What Was Really Synthesized During the Evolutionary Synthesis? A Historiographic Proposal. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 42 (1):50-59.
Richard G. Delisle (2011). What Was Really Synthesized During the Evolutionary Synthesis? A Historiographic Proposal. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (1):50-59.
Similar books and articles
Osamu Sakura (1998). Similarities and Varieties: A Brief Sketch on the Reception of Darwinism and Sociobiology in Japan. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 13 (3):341-357.
Christine Clavien (forthcoming). Evolution, Society, and Ethics: Social Darwinism Versus Evolutionary Ethics. In Thomas Heams (ed.), Handbook of Evolutionary Biology (provis. Title). Springer
Alfred Nordmann (1992). Darwinians at War Bateson's Place in Histories of Darwinism. Synthese 91 (1-2):53 - 72.
Giovanni Camardi (1999). Charles Lyell and the Uniformity Principle. Biology and Philosophy 14 (4):537-560.
Philip Lawrence (1978). Charles Lyell Versus the Theory of Central Heat: A Reappraisal of Lyell's Place in the History of Geology. Journal of the History of Biology 11 (1):101 - 128.
Maria Kronfeldner (2007). Darwinism, Memes, and Creativity: A Critique of Darwinian Analogical Reasoning From Nature to Culture. Dissertation, University of Regensburg
Victor Joseph di Fate (2011). Arguing for Uniformity: Rethinking Lyell's Principles of Geology. Perspectives on Science 19 (2):136-153.
Charles Lyell (1970). Sir Charles Lyell's Scientific Journals on the Species Question. New Haven,Yale University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #232,969 of 1,792,914 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,717 of 1,792,914 )
How can I increase my downloads?