David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (1):71-86 (2008)
St. Thomas Aquinas has been considered a kairos in intellectual history for seeing God’s essence as being. Martin Heidegger criticized philosophers forrepresenting being as a be-ing and identifying it with God, and Jean-Luc Marion speaks of “God without being.” In her Potency and Act Edith Stein introduced thecategory of being without essence, but such being is not God but “the opposite.” For St. Augustine sin was an approach to nonbeing, and Stein saw it leading to a“displacement into nonbeing,” to an “annihilation” where only a “null being” is retained. This eschatological reflection is an intriguing aspect of her “fusion” ofscholasticism and phenomenology
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard Feist & William Sweet (eds.) (2003). Husserl and Stein. The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
Angela Ales Bello (2008). Edmund Husserl and Edith Stein. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (1):143-159.
Antonio Calcagno (2008). Being, Aevum , and Nothingness: Edith Stein on Death and Dying. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 41 (1):59-72.
Victor M. Salas (2011). Edith Stein and Medieval Metaphysics. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (2):323 - 340.
Karl Schudt (2008). Edith Stein's Proof for the Existence of God From Consciousness. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (1):105-125.
Antonio Calcagno (2009). Edith Stein (Edith Stein). Symposium 13 (2):213-217.
Edith Stein (1986). The Collected Works of Edith Stein, Sister Teresa Benedicta of the Cross, Discalced Carmelite. Ics Publications.
Jane Duran (2011). Teresian Influence on the Work of Edith Stein. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 32 (3):242 - 254.
Mette Lebech (2007). Reading Stein—Some Guidelines for the Perplexed: A Review of Edith Stein by Sarah Borden and of Edith Stein: A Philosophical Prologue, 1913–1922 by Alasdair Macintyre. [REVIEW] International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (1):103-112.
Sarah Borden Sharkey (2008). Edith Stein and Thomas Aquinas on Being and Essence. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (1):87-103.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #95,211 of 1,088,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?