Idealism: A love (of sophia) that dare not speak its name
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Arts 29:71–94 (2007)
My first experience of philosophy at the University of Sydney was as a commencing undergraduate in the tumultuous year of 1973. At the start of that year, there was one department of philosophy, but by the beginning of the next there were two. These two departments seemed to be opposed in every possible way except one: they both professed to be committed to a form of materialist philosophy. One could think that having a common enemy at least might have been the cause for some degree of unanimity, but no: the traditional enemy of materialism—idealism—was regarded to have been long dead and buried. For the Marxists in the then “Department of General Philosophy”, it had been Marx who, in the second half of the nineteenth century, had “inverted” Hegelian idealism into a form of materialism, while for the analytic philosophers in the “Department of Traditional and Modern Philosophy”, it had been Bertrand Russell and G. E. Moore who had triumphed over British idealism at the turn of the twentieth. There may have been many things that were atypical about philosophy as it was done at Sydney in the early 1970s, but its resistance to idealism was not among them.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Paolo Diego Bubbio (2014). Hegel, the Trinity, and the ‘I’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (2):129-150.
Similar books and articles
Peter Koslowski (ed.) (2005). The Discovery of Historicity in German Idealism and Historism. Springer.
Stewart Candlish (2007). The Russell/Bradley Dispute and its Significance for Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Peter Ms Hacker (2007). Analytic Philosophy: Beyond the Linguistic Turn and Back Again. In Micahel Beaney (ed.), The Analytic Turn. Routledge
George Berkeley (1999). Principles of Human Knowledge and Three Dialogues. Oxford University Press.
Paul Redding (2010). The Possibility of German Idealism After Analytic Philosophy : McDowell, Brandom and Beyond. In James Williams (ed.), Postanalytic and Metacontinental: Crossing Philosophical Divides. Continuum
George Berkeley (1996). Principles of Human Knowledge ;. Oxford University Press.
William Sweet (2012). British Idealism and its Empire. Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 17 (1):7-36.
Tom Rockmore (2004). Hegel, Idealism, and Analytic Philosophy. Yale University Press.
Peter Hylton (1990). Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #196,884 of 1,926,168 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #456,082 of 1,926,168 )
How can I increase my downloads?