David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (2):78-82 (1996)
The same research proposal was submitted to 24 district health authority (DHA) research ethics committees in different parts of the country. The objective was to obtain permission for a multi-centre research project. The study of neonatal care in different types of unit (regional, subregional and district), required that four health authorities were approached in each of six widely separated health regions in England. Data were collected and compared concerning aspects of processing, including application forms, information required, timing and decision-making. The key finding was that ethics committees received and processed the applications variably, reflecting individual factors and local problems. To improve consensus and facilitate multicentre studies, standard forms and instructions are suggested and the establishment of a national committee or advisory group advocated
|Keywords||info:mesh/Government Regulation info:mesh/Informed Consent info:mesh/Multicenter Studies as Topic info:mesh/Clinical Trials as Topic info:mesh/Ethics Committees info:mesh/Ethical Review info:mesh/Research Design info:mesh/Humans info:mesh/Ethics Committees, Research Humans Neonatal Nursing Research Design Government Regulation Informed Consent Ethical Review Ethics Committees Ethics Committees, Research Infant, Newborn Legal Guardians England Female Male Clinical Trials as Topic Multicenter Studies as Topic info:mesh/England info:mesh/Legal Guardians info:mesh/Neonatal Nursing info:mesh/Male info:mesh/Female info:mesh/Infant, Newborn|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Eric G. Yan & Kerim M. Munir (2004). Regulatory and Ethical Principles in Research Involving Children and Individuals with Developmental Disabilities. Ethics and Behavior 14 (1):31 – 49.
Edith Valdez-martinez, Bernardo Turnbull, Juan Garduño-espinosa & John D. H. Porter (2006). Descriptive Ethics: A Qualitative Study of Local Research Ethics Committees in Mexico. Developing World Bioethics 6 (2):95–105.
Daniela Marchetti, Angelico Spagnolo, Marina Cicerone, Fidelia Cascini, Giuseppe La Monaca & Antonio G. Spagnolo (2013). Research Ethics Committee Auditing: The Experience of a University Hospital. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 25 (3):257-268.
Similar books and articles
J.-L. W. Mitchell Der Zahvann & Greg Tower (2004). Audit Committee Features and Earnings Management: Further Evidence From Singapore. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (s 2-3):233-258.
Sandra C. Vera-Muñoz (2005). Corporate Governance Reforms: Redefined Expectations of Audit Committee Responsibilities and Effectiveness. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 62 (2):115 - 127.
Anna M. Rose & Jacob M. Rose (2008). Management Attempts to Avoid Accounting Disclosure Oversight: The Effects of Trust and Knowledge on Corporate Directors' Governance Ability. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 83 (2):193 - 205.
David Shaw (2011). The Ethics Committee as Ghost Author. Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (12):706-706.
J.-L. W. Mitchell Der Zahvann (2004). Association Between Board of Director Characteristics and the Amount of Voluntary Audit Committee Disclosures. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (s 2-3):210-232.
J. Berry (1997). Local Research Ethics Committees Can Audit Ethical Standards in Research. Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (6):379-381.
Marcel J. H. Kenter (2009). Regulating Human Participants Protection in Medical Research and the Accreditation of Medical Research Ethics Committees in the Netherlands. Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):33-43.
Evelyne Decullier, Véronique Lhéritier & François Chapuis (2005). The Activity of French Research Ethics Committees and Characteristics of Biomedical Research Protocols Involving Humans: A Retrospective Cohort Study. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 6 (1):1-10.
Reidar Pedersen, Victoria Akre & Reidun Førde (2009). Barriers and Challenges in Clinical Ethics Consultations: The Experiences of Nine Clinical Ethics Committees. Bioethics 23 (8):460-469.
Teresa Moore & Kristy Richardson (2013). The Low Risk Research Ethics Application Process at CQUniversity Australia. Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (3):211-230.
Akira Akabayashi, Brian T. Slingsby, Noriko Nagao, Ichiro Kai & Hajime Sato (2007). An Eight-Year Follow-Up National Study of Medical School and General Hospital Ethics Committees in Japan. BMC Medical Ethics 8 (1):1-8.
Alice Gaudine, Marianne Lamb, Sandra LeFort & Linda Thorne (2011). The Functioning of Hospital Ethics Committees: A Multiple-Case Study of Four Canadian Committees. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 23 (3):225-238.
E. Cave & C. Nichols (2007). Clinical Audit and Reform of the UK Research Ethics Review System. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (3):181-203.
Stuart F. Spicker (ed.) (1998). The Healthcare Ethics Committee Experience: Selected Readings From Hec Forum. Krieger Pub. Co..
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads9 ( #339,938 of 1,790,117 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #265,702 of 1,790,117 )
How can I increase my downloads?