David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Mario de Caro & David Macarthur (eds.), Naturalism and Normativity. Columbia University Press (2010)
Usually, analytic philosophy is thought of as standing firmly within the tradition of empiricism, but recently attention has been drawn to the strongly Kantian features that have characterized this philosophical movement throughout a considerable part of its history.1 Those charting the history of early analytic philosophy sometimes point to a more Kantian stream of thought feeding it from both Frege and Wittgenstein, and as countering a quite different stream flowing from the early Russell and Moore.2 In line with this general assessment, Michael Friedman has pointed to the specifically Kantian features of the approach of Carnap and other members of the Vienna Circle.3 For Friedman, the positivists should be seen as having emerged from the tradition of late nineteenth-century neo-Kantianism. Although they had explicitly rejected Kant’s analysis of geometric truth and his key concept of the “synthetic a priori” because of dramatic changes within science itself, this move should not be seen as any simple abandonment of Kantianism.4 Rather, the positivists had redefined the nature of the Kantian a priori, by axiomatizing, relativizing and historicizing it, so as to fit with the results of the contemporary sciences.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert Hanna (2001). Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Alberto Coffa (1991). The Semantic Tradition From Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station. Cambridge University Press.
Peter Ms Hacker (2007). Analytic Philosophy: Beyond the Linguistic Turn and Back Again. In Micahel Beaney (ed.), The Analytic Turn. Routledge.
Daniel Breazeale (2003). Two Cheers for Post-Kantianism: A Response to Karl Ameriks. Inquiry 46 (2):239 – 259.
Tom Rockmore (2004). Hegel, Idealism, and Analytic Philosophy. Yale University Press.
Sami Pihlström & Arto Siitonen (2005). The Transcendental Method and (Post-)Empiricist Philosophy of Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 36 (1):81 - 106.
Peter Hylton (1990). Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Paul Redding (2010). The Possibility of German Idealism After Analytic Philosophy : McDowell, Brandom and Beyond. In James Williams (ed.), Postanalytic and Metacontinental: Crossing Philosophical Divides. Continuum.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads51 ( #26,514 of 1,088,873 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,661 of 1,088,873 )
How can I increase my downloads?