The Metaphysical and Theological Commitments of Idealism: Kant, Hegel, Hegelianism
Graduate studies at Western
In Douglas Moggach (ed.), Politics, Religion, and Art: Hegelian Debates. Northwestern University Press (2011)
|Abstract||It is sometimes said that changes in academic philosophy in the twentieth century reflected a process in which a discipline that had been earlier closely tied to institutional religion became increasingly laicized and secularized.1 In line with this idea, the idealist philosophy that had flowered within British philosophy at the end of the nineteenth century can look like the last and ill-fated attempt of a Victorian religious sensibility to guard itself against a post-Darwinian God-less view of the world and ourselves.2 Such a view generally represents, I believe, the attitudes of many contemporary philosophers to British philosophy prior to the transforming work of Russell and Moore of about one hundred years ago. Against the luxuriant and mystical metaphysics of the idealists, fuelled by religious longing, the “new philosophy”, it is thought, affirmed the brute materiality of the world and its independence from mind, be it divine or human. A similar development is commonly understood as carrying from Hegel through the “<span class='Hi'>young</span> Hegelians” to the mature Marx. Thus for Feuerbach, for example, Hegel’s idealist doctrine that “nature or reality is posited by the idea” was “merely the rational expression of the theological doctrine that nature is created by God”.3 Hegel’s philosophy had thus provided a “last place of refuge and ... rational support of theology”, and escaping from this condition (more prison than refuge) required rejecting idealism and confronting the fact that “the true relation of thinking and being is simply this. Being is subject and thinking a predicate but a predicate such as..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
George Di Giovanni (2003). Faith Without Religion, Religion Without Faith: Kant and Hegel on Religion. Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (3):365-383.
Paul Redding (2011). The Analytic Neo-Hegelianism of John McDowell & Robert Brandom. In Stephen Houlgate & Michael Baur (eds.), A Companion to Hegel. Blackwell.
F. Beiser (2003). Hegel and Naturphilosophie. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):135-147.
Robert B. Pippin (1989). Hegel's Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Sally S. Sedgwick (ed.) (2000). The Reception of Kant's Critical Philosophy: Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel. Cambridge University Press.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1993). Hegel, Idealism, and Robert Pippin. International Philosophical Quarterly 33 (3):263-272.
Robert R. Williams (2010). Hegel's Concept of The True Infinite. The Owl of Minerva 42 (1-2):89-122.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2009). ‘Does Kant’s Opus Postumum Anticipate Hegel’s Absolute Idealism?’. In E.-O. Onnasch (ed.), Kants Philosophie der Natur. Ihre Entwicklung bis zum Opus postumum und Nachwirkung. deGruyter.
Tom Rockmore (2004). Hegel, Idealism, and Analytic Philosophy. Yale University Press.
John Hund (1998). Hegel's Break with Kant: The Leap From Individual Psychology to Sociology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (2):226-243.
Robert R. Williams (2006). Beyond Tradition and Modernity. The Owl of Minerva 37 (1):29-56.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads14 ( #90,833 of 756,449 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,427 of 756,449 )
How can I increase my downloads?