The role of apparent constraints in normative reasoning: A methodological statement and application to global justice [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Ethics 9 (1-2):119 - 125 (2005)
The assumptions that are made about the features of the world that are relatively changeable by agents and those that are not (constraints) play a central role in determining normative conclusions. In this way, normative reasoning is deeply dependent on accounts of the empirical world. Successful normative reasoning must avoid the naturalization of constraints and seek to attribute correctly to agents what is and is not in their power to change. Recent discourse on global justice has often come to unjustified conclusions about agents obligations due to a narrow view of what is changeable and by whom.
|Keywords||causes constraints facts global justice institutions obligations|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Earl Hunt (2000). Situational Constraints on Normative Reasoning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):680-680.
Denis G. Arnold (2003). Libertarian Theories of the Corporate and Global Capitalism. Journal of Business Ethics 48 (2):155-173.
Samia Hurst (2010). What 'Empirical Turn in Bioethics'? Bioethics 24 (8):439-444.
Katinka Quintelier & Daniel Fessler (2012). Varying Versions of Moral Relativism: The Philosophy and Psychology of Normative Relativism. Biology and Philosophy 27 (1):95-113.
Edward H. Spence (2009). A Universal Model for the Normative Evaluation of Internet Information. Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4):243-253.
Kostas Koukouzelis (2009). Liberal Internationalism and Global Social Justice. Journal of Global Ethics 5 (2):97-108.
Paul A. Klaczynski (2000). Is Rationality Really “Bounded” by Information Processing Constraints? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):683-684.
Jonathan Wolff (2009). Global Justice and Norms of Co-Operation: The 'Layers of Justice' View. In Stephen De Wijze, Matthew H. Kramer & Ian Carter (eds.), Hillel Steiner and the Anatomy of Justice: Themes and Challenges. Routledge 16--34.
Jan Bransen (2001). On Exploring Normative Constraints in New Situations. Inquiry 44 (1):43 – 62.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #158,709 of 1,777,777 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,290 of 1,777,777 )
How can I increase my downloads?