David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Acta Biotheoretica 28 (3):217-233 (1979)
The founders of the Marburger Schule of Neo-Kantianism, Hermann Cohen and Paul Natorp, laid an emphasis upon a Platonic understanding of mathematics and logic as the paradigmatic epistemological basis of philosophy. Their successors, namely Ernst Cassirer and Nicolai Hartmann, made obvious, however, that new biological thinking can have a strong influence on ontology as well as on the theory of knowledge. They could show that biology was no longer to be treated as a metaphysical system in that pejorative meaning of metaphysics which Kant had so severely been opposing. Against the anti-realistic approach of the older neo-Kantians who wanted to eliminate Kant's thing-in-itself (Ding an sich), both Cassirer and Hartmann returned to a form of realism by way of Hegel's philosophical results and reflections on his method. This makes clear that their realism is still to be taken as a more of less monistic idealism. However, considering that modern biology as an antimetaphysical force became influential in their system for the first time and that it did so in two different but - on second thoughts - complementary ways, it becomes clear that it was necessary to change the paradigms of any neo-Kantian philosophy. Cassirer proved this by his development as a philosopher with a strong historical impetus while Hartmann as a more systematical philosopher only pointed in that direction.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ernst Cassirer (1910). Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 18 (6):7-8.
G. Gerland (1905). Immanuel Kant, seine geographischen und anthropologischen Arbeiten. Kant-Studien 10 (1-3):1-43.
Hans-Joachim Lieber (1950). Kants Philosophie des Organischen und die Biologie seiner Zeit. Philosophia Naturalis 1:553.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Mormann (2008). Idealization in Cassirer's Philosophy of Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2):151 - 181.
Thora Ilin Bayer (2010). Ernst Cassirer. Ausgewählter Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (3):403-404.
Paul Arthur Schilpp (1949). The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer. New York, Tudor Pub. Co..
Frederik Stjernfelt (2011). Simple Animals and Complex Biology: Von Uexküll's Two-Fold Influence on Cassirer's Philosophy. Synthese 179 (1):169 - 186.
Jeremy Heis (2010). “Critical Philosophy Begins at the Very Point Where Logistic Leaves Off”: Cassirer's Response to Frege and Russell. Perspectives on Science 18 (4):383-408.
Sebastian Luft (2004). Forms of Knowledge and Sensibility: Ernst Cassirer and the Human Sciences, And: Dilthey Und Cassirer: Die Deutung der Neuzeit Als Muster von Geistes- Und Kulturgeschichte (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (4):504-506.
Jeremy Heis (2011). Ernst Cassirer's Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Geometry. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (4):759 - 794.
John Michael Krois (1992). Cassirer, Neo-Kantianism and Metaphysics. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 97 (4):437 - 453.
Frederic Tremblay (2011). Nicolai Hartmann's Definition of Biological Species. In Roberto Poli, Carlo Scognamiglio & Frederic Tremblay (eds.), The Philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann. Walter de Gruyter 125--139.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #172,557 of 1,906,928 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #200,756 of 1,906,928 )
How can I increase my downloads?