The problem of the trinity in Whitehead's philosophy of God

Modern Schoolman 62 (4):317 - 335 (1985)
Abstract
THIS ARTICLE EXAMINES THREE QUESTIONS: (1) HOW CAN A TRIUNE NOTION OF GOD BE ACCOMMODATED IN WHITEHEAD’S DI-POLAR THEISM? (2) HOW CAN GOD BE THREE PERSONS AND YET ONE ACTUAL ENTITY? AND (3) HOW CAN GOD BE BOTH IMMANENT AND TRANSCENDENT? AFTER LOOKING AT THE WORK OF JOSEPH BRACKEN, S J AND LEWIS FORD ON THESE QUESTIONS, IT IS CONCLUDED THAT WHITEHEAD’S PHILOSOPHY CANNOT SERVE AS THE GROUND FOR A TRADITIONAL INTERPRETATION OF TRINITARIAN THEOLOGY WITHOUT INVOLVING MAJOR DISTORTIONS OF HIS ORIGINAL POSITION
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,365
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Lewis S. Ford (1975). Process Trinitarianism. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 43:199 - 213.
Lewis S. Ford (2002). Can Thomas and Whitehead Complement Each Other? American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):491-502.
Brian Leftow (2004). A Latin Trinity. Faith and Philosophy 21 (3):304-333.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-06-16

Total downloads

6 ( #206,643 of 1,102,742 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #46,741 of 1,102,742 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.