Journal of Business Ethics 112 (1):137-154 (2013)
|Abstract||This empirical study examines corporate responses to activist shareholder groups filing social-policy shareholder resolutions. Using resource dependency theory as our conceptual framing, we identify some of the drivers of corporate responses to shareholder activists. This study departs from previous studies by including a fourth possible corporate response, engaging in dialogue. Dialogue, an alternative to shareholder resolutions filed by activists, is a process in which corporations and activist shareholder groups mutually agree to engage in ongoing negotiations to deal with social issues. Based on a unique dataset of resolutions filed by member organizations of the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility from 2002 to 2005 and the outcomes of these resolutions, our analysis finds that corporate managers are more likely to engage in dialogue with shareholder activists when the firm is larger, is more responsive to stakeholders, the CEO is the board chair, and the firm has a relatively lower percentage of institutional investors.|
|Keywords||Corporate governance Corporate social responsibility Dialogue Shareholder activism Shareholder resolutions Social activism Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jeanne M. Logsdon, Harry van Buren Iii & Kathleen Rehbein (2008). Social Responsibility Ratings and Corporate Responses to Activist Shareholder Resolutions. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:307-317.
Jeanne M. Logsdon & Harry J. Van Buren (2009). Beyond the Proxy Vote: Dialogues Between Shareholder Activists and Corporations. Journal of Business Ethics 87:353 - 365.
Sara A. Morris (2009). Corporate Targets of Shareholder Resolutions. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:36-46.
Joakim Sandberg (2011). Changing the World Through Shareholder Activism? Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 5 (1):51-78.
Emmanuel Adegbite, Kenneth Amaeshi & Olufemi Amao (2012). The Politics of Shareholder Activism in Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics 105 (3):389-402.
Olufemi Amao & Kenneth Amaeshi (2008). Galvanising Shareholder Activism: A Prerequisite for Effective Corporate Governance and Accountability in Nigeria. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1):119 - 130.
Richard Lee Miller (1988). Ethical Challenges in Corporate-Shareholder and Investor Relations: Using the Value Exchange Model to Analyze and Respond. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (1-2):117 - 132.
Elias Bengtsson (2007). Organisational Approaches to Corporate Governance: An Empirical Study on Shareholder Activism. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (3):238-249.
Donald H. Schepers (2007). A Network Analysis of Shareholder Activism. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:351-356.
Peter Koslowski (2000). The Limits of Shareholder Value. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):137 - 148.
Dendi Ramdani & Arjen Witteloostuijn (2012). The Shareholder—Manager Relationship and Its Impact on the Likelihood of Firm Bribery. Journal of Business Ethics 108 (4):495 - 507.
Clive Smallman (2004). Exploring Theoretical Paradigms in Corporate Governance. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (1):78-94.
Thomas A. Hemphill (2007). The US Securities and Exchange Commission and Shareholder Director Nominations: Paving the Way for Special Interest Directors? International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (1):19-32.
Aaron A. Dhir (2012). Shareholder Engagement in the Embedded Business Corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (1):99-118.
Jacob M. Rose (2007). Corporate Directors and Social Responsibility: Ethics Versus Shareholder Value. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 73 (3):319 - 331.
Added to index2012-02-24
Total downloads7 ( #142,281 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,645 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?