Natural theology and epistemic justification

Heythrop Journal 51 (6):1017-1022 (2010)
Abstract
First it is argued that the linkage of natural theology to epistemology is invalid historically, epistemologically and metaphysically. Second it is argued that knowledge claims about the ultimate cause of everything should be evaluated not in terms of justified true belief but in terms of the intellectual virtue of wisdom
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    Heather Battaly (2008). Virtue Epistemology. Philosophy Compass 3 (4):639-663.
    Lorraine Code (1987). Epistemic Responsibility. Published for Brown University Press by University Press of New England.

    View all 17 references

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Michael Sudduth (2009). Revisiting the ‘Reformed Objection’ to Natural Theology. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (2):37-62.
    J. Angelo Corlett (2008). Epistemic Responsibility. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (2):179 – 200.
    John Zeis (2010). Evidentialism Versus Faith. Social Epistemology 24 (1):1 – 13.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-09-01

    Total downloads

    17 ( #82,059 of 1,088,907 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,735 of 1,088,907 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.