Categorically denied: Kant's criticism of chinese philosophy
Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33 (1):51–65 (2006)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStephen R. Palmquist (2011). Introduction: Levels of Perspectives in Kant and Chinese Philosophy. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 38 (4):505-508.
Wiebke Denecke (2010). The Dynamics of Masters Literature: Early Chinese Thought From Confucius to Han Feizi. Distributed by Harvard University Press.
Martin Muller (2006). Aspects of the Chinese Reception of Kant. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33 (1):141-157.
Martin Müller (2006). Aspects of the Chinese Reception of Kant. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33 (1):141–157.
Yang Disheng (1994). Mourning Professor Feng Youlan: "Method of Abstract Inheriting" Should Not Be Denied. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 21 (3-4):407-430.
Christina Hoff (1983). Kant's Invidious Humanism. Environmental Ethics 5 (1):63-70.
John Hyman (2003). Pains and Places. Philosophy 78 (303):5-24.
Pirmin Stekeler-Weithofer (2006). The Question of System: How to Read the Development From Kant to Hegel. Inquiry 49 (1):80 – 102.
Edward Caird (1889/1969). The Critical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Amsterdam, Rodopi.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #202,008 of 549,128 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
