Do Demonstrations Have Semantic Significance?

Analysis 51 (4):177--183 (1991)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/51.4.177
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,658
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Stefano Predelli (2012). Bare-Boned Demonstratives. Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (3):547-562.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Robert M. Harnish (1994). What is the Sense of Phos and Hes? Grazer Philosophische Studien 47:185-196.
Ben Caplan (2002). Quotation and Demonstration. Philosophical Studies 111 (1):69-80.
Douglas Allchin (1992). How Do You Falsify a Question?: Crucial Tests Versus Crucial Demonstrations. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:74 - 88.
Stefano Predelli (2012). Bare-Boned Demonstratives. Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (3):547-562.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

68 ( #49,780 of 1,725,935 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

33 ( #31,684 of 1,725,935 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.