Hasker on Omniscience

Faith and Philosophy 4 (1):86-92 (1987)
Abstract I contend that William Hasker’s argument to show omniscience incompatible with human freedom trades on an ambiguity between altering and bringing about the past, and that it is the latter only which is invoked by one who thinks they are compatible. I then use his notion of precluding circumstances to suggest that what gives the appearance of our inability to freely bring about the future (and hence that omniscience is incompatible with freedom) is that, from God’s perspective of foreknowledge, it is as if the event has already occurred, but that as if conditions do not tell us about the conditions under which the act was performed (whether it was free or not)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,709
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Michael Rota (2010). A Problem for Hasker. Faith and Philosophy 27 (3):287-305.
    Daniel Diederich Farmer (2010). Defining Omniscience. Faith and Philosophy 27 (3):306-320.
    Robert Bass (2007). Omniscience and the Identification Problem. Florida Philosophical Review 7 (1):78-91.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

    Added to index

    2010-11-29

    Total downloads

    1 ( #274,982 of 549,591 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,397 of 549,591 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums