David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):399-415 (2011)
Until recently, little attention has been paid in the school classroom to creationism and almost none to intelligent design. However, creationism and possibly intelligent design appear to be on the increase and there are indications that there are more countries in which schools are becoming battle-grounds over them. I begin by examining whether creationism and intelligent design are controversial issues, drawing on Robert Dearden's epistemic criterion of the controversial and more recent responses to and defences of this. I then examine whether the notion of ‘worldviews’ in the context of creationism is a useful one by considering the film March of the Penguins. I conclude that the ‘worldviews’ perspective on creationism is useful for two reasons: first it indicates the difficulty of using the criterion of reason to decide whether an issue is controversial or not; secondly, it suggests that standard ways of addressing the diversity of student views in a science classroom may be inadequate. I close by examining the implications of this view for teaching in science lessons and elsewhere, for example in religious education lessons and citizenship lessons and at primary level where subject divisions cannot be made in so clear-cut a manner
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Imre Lakatos (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge University Press.
Ian G. Barbour (1990). Religion in an Age of Science. Harper and Row.
Michael J. Behe (1998). Darwin's Black Box the Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Jeffrey Koperski (2008). Two Bad Ways to Attack Intelligent Design and Two Good Ones. Zygon 43 (2):433-449.
Philip Kitcher & Marcel C. La Follette (1984). Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism. Journal of the History of Biology 17 (1):147-148.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Massimo Pigliucci (2007). The Problems with Creationism. In A. J. Petto & L. R. Godfrey (eds.), Scientists Confront Intelligent Design and Creationism. Norton
Sahotra Sarkar (2011). The Science Question in Intelligent Design. Synthese 178 (2):291 - 305.
Massimo Pigliucci (2009). Is Intelligent Design Creationism? In Kendrick Frazier (ed.), Science Under Siege: Defending Science, Exposing Pseudoscience. Prometheus
Robert T. Pennock (ed.) (2001). Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientifc Perspectives. MIT Press.
Michael Weisberg (2006). The Intelligent Design Controversy: Lessons From Psychology and Education. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (2):56-57.
Kazimierz Jodkowski (2006). Epistemiczny układ odniesienia teorii inteligentnego projektu. Filozofia Nauki 1.
Jeffrey Koperski (2003). Intelligent Design and the End of Science. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (4):567-588.
Massimo Pigliucci (2001). Design, Yes; Intelligent, No. Philosophy Now 32:26-29.
Massimo Pigliucci (2007). Evolution, Schmevolution: Jon Stewart and the Culture Wars. In J. Holt (ed.), The Daily Show and Philosophy. Wiley
Robert T. Pennock (2006). The Premodern Sins of Intelligent Design. In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. OUP Oxford 732-747.
Added to index2011-03-04
Total downloads115 ( #32,895 of 1,902,049 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #466,347 of 1,902,049 )
How can I increase my downloads?