David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (2005)
This intriguing and ground-breaking book is the first in-depth study of the development of philosophy of science in the United States during the Cold War. It documents the political vitality of logical empiricism and Otto Neurath's Unity of Science Movement when these projects emigrated to the US in the 1930s and follows their de-politicization by a convergence of intellectual, cultural and political forces in the 1950s. Students of logical empiricism and the Vienna Circle treat these as strictly intellectual non-political projects. In fact, the refugee philosophers of science were highly active politically and debated questions about values inside and outside science, as a result of which their philosophy of science was scrutinized politically both from within and without the profession, by such institutions as J. Edgar Hoover's FBI. It will prove absorbing reading to philosophers and historians of science, intellectual historians, and scholars of Cold War studies.
|Keywords||Science History Cold War Influence Logical positivism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$83.54 new (28% off) $83.56 used (28% off) $115.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||Q174.8.R45 2005|
|ISBN(s)||0521837979 9780521837972 9780521837972 (hardback : alk. paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Robert Frodeman (2013). Philosophy Dedisciplined. Synthese 190 (11):1917-1936.
Heather Douglas (2010). Engagement for Progress: Applied Philosophy of Science in Context. Synthese 177 (3):317-335.
Robert Frodeman & Adam Briggle (2012). The Dedisciplining of Peer Review. Minerva 50 (1):3-19.
Nicholas Binney (2015). Nosology, Ontology and Promiscuous Realism. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 21 (3):391-397.
Elena Aronova (2012). The Congress for Cultural Freedom, Minerva, and the Quest for Instituting “Science Studies” in the Age of Cold War. Minerva 50 (3):307-337.
Similar books and articles
Justin Biddle (2011). Putting Pragmatism to Work in the Cold War: Science, Technology, and Politics in the Writings of James B. Conant. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):552-561.
John Capps (2006). Review: George Reisch. How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. [REVIEW] Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):167-171.
Robert Cherry (1999). Holocaust Historiography: The Role of the Cold War. Science and Society 63 (4):459 - 477.
Nancy Cartwright (ed.) (1996). Otto Neurath: Philosophy Between Science and Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Esther-Mirjam Sent (2000). Herbert A. Simon as a Cyborg Scientist. Perspectives on Science 8 (4):380-406.
Elena Aronova (2011). The Politics and Contexts of Soviet Science Studies (Naukovedenie): Soviet Philosophy of Science at the Crossroads. Studies in East European Thought 63 (3):175-202.
Steve Fuller (2006). Review Essay: The Philosophical Buck Stops Here. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (3):355-366.
Jonathan Y. Tsou (2007). Review of George A. Reisch, How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Science 40 (1):153-155.
Michael W. Tkacz (2006). How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: To the Icy Slopes of Logic. Review of Metaphysics 60 (1):171-173.
Scott Edgar (2009). Logical Empiricism, Politics, and Professionalism. Science and Education 18 (2):177-189.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #147,784 of 1,780,586 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,765 of 1,780,586 )
How can I increase my downloads?