David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):43-54 (1999)
Richard Swinburne claims that Christ’s death has no efficacy unless people appropriate it. According to religious inclusivists, God can be encountered and his grace manifested in various ways through diverse religions. Salvation is available for everyone, regardless of whether they have heard about Christ’s sacrifice. This poses the question whether Swinburne’s view of atonement is available to the inclusivist. I develop an inclusivist interpretation of the atonement that incorporates his four features of atonement, along with a subjective dimension that need not include specific knowledge of Christ’s sacrifice
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Steven S. Aspenson (1996). Swinburne on Atonement. Religious Studies 32 (2):187 - 204.
David Mcnaughton (1992). Reparation and Atonement. Religious Studies 28 (2):129 - 144.
Robert C. Roberts (2002). Virtues and the Atonement of Christ. Faith and Philosophy 19 (3):275-290.
Richard Swinburne (1988). The Christian Scheme of Salvation. In Thomas V. Morris (ed.), Philosophy and the Christian Faith. Univ. Of Notre Dame Press. 13-30.
Richard Cross (2001). Atonement Without Satisfaction. Religious Studies 37 (4):397-416.
Bruce R. Reichenbach (2004). Dances of Death: Self-Sacrifice and Atonement. In Mel Gibson’s ’Passion’ and Philosophy: The Cross, the Questions, the Controversy. Open Court.
Tim Bayne & Greg Restall (2009). A Participatory Model of the Atonement. In Yujin Nagasawa & Erik J. Wielenberg (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan. 150.
Richard Swinburne (1989). Responsibility and Atonement. Oxford University Press.
Vincent Brümmer (1992). Atonement and Reconciliation. Religious Studies 28 (4):435 - 452.
Steven L. Porter (2004). Swinburnian Atonement and the Doctrine of Penal Substitution. Faith and Philosophy 21 (2):228-241.
Philip L. Quinn (1986). Christian Atonement and Kantian Justification. Faith and Philosophy 3 (4):440-462.
Patrick Sherry (1998). Redeeming the Past. Religious Studies 34 (2):165-175.
Amir Dastmalchian (2012). Swinburne on the Atonement: Reflections on Philosophical Theology and Religious Dialogue. Journal of Inter-Religious Dialogue (10):49-60.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads24 ( #103,904 of 1,696,616 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #57,743 of 1,696,616 )
How can I increase my downloads?