David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 93 (3):373 - 402 (1992)
Three views of demonstrative reference are examined: contextual, intentional, and quasi-intentional. According to the first, such reference is determined entirely by certain publicly accessible features of the context. According to the second, speaker intentions are criterial in demonstrative reference. And according to the third, both contextual features and intentions come into play in the determination of demonstrative reference. The first two views (both of which enjoy current popularity) are rejected as implausible; the third (originally proposed by Kaplan in Dthat) is argued to be highly plausible.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Joseph Almog, John Perry, Howard K. Wettstein & David Kaplan (eds.) (1989). Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press, USA.
D. Sperber & D. Wilson (1995). Relevance. Blackwell.
Charles Travis (1989). The Uses of Sense: Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press.
François Recanati (1989). The Pragmatics of What is Said. Mind and Language 4 (4):295-329.
Geoffrey Nunberg (1979). The Non-Uniqueness of Semantic Solutions: Polysemy. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 3 (2):143 - 184.
Citations of this work BETA
Jeffrey C. King (2014). Speaker Intentions in Context. Noûs 48 (2):219-237.
Jeffrey C. King (2013). Supplementives, the Coordination Account, and Conflicting Intentions. Philosophical Perspectives 27 (1):288-311.
Stefano Predelli (2012). Bare-Boned Demonstratives. Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (3):547-562.
Una Stojnic, Matthew Stone & Ernie Lepore (2013). Deixis. Philosophical Perspectives 27 (1):502-525.
Alexandru Radulescu (2015). The Logic of Indexicals. Synthese 192 (6):1839-1860.
Similar books and articles
Alberto Voltolini (2009). How Demonstrative Pictorial Reference Grounds Contextualism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (3):402-418.
Allyson Mount (2008). Intentions, Gestures, and Salience in Ordinary and Deferred Demonstrative Reference. Mind and Language 23 (2):145–164.
Declan Smithies (2011). What is the Role of Consciousness in Demonstrative Thought? Journal of Philosophy 108 (1):5-34.
Gareth Evans (1982). The Varieties of Reference. Oxford University Press.
Kent Bach (1992). Intentions and Demonstrations. Analysis 52 (3):140--146.
Claudia Bianchi (2003). How to Refer: Objective Context Vs. Intentional Context. In P. Blackburn, C. Ghidini, R. Turner & F. Giunchiglia (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context (Context'03), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2680. Springer
Mark Textor (2007). Frege's Theory of Hybrid Proper Names Developed and Defended. Mind 116 (464):947-982.
Imogen Dickie (2014). The Sortal Dependence of Demonstrative Reference. European Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):34-60.
Athanassios Raftopoulos & Vincent C. Müller (2006). Nonconceptual Demonstrative Reference. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2):251-285.
Susanna Siegel (2002). The Role of Perception in Demonstrative Reference. Philosophers' Imprint 2 (1):1-21.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads95 ( #33,460 of 1,725,989 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #92,620 of 1,725,989 )
How can I increase my downloads?