David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Faith and Philosophy 18 (2):222-240 (2001)
In arecent article, Michael Murray critiques several versions of universalism-that is, the doctrine that in the end all persons are saved. Of particular interest to Murray is Thomas Talbott’s version of universalism (called SU1 by Murray), which puts forward a strategy for ensuring universal salvation that purports to preserve the autonomy of the creatures saved. Murray argues that, on the contrary, the approach put forward in SU1 is not autonomy-preserving at all. I argue that this approach preserves the autonomy of the creature at least as well as the approach posited by the traditional doctrine of hell. Since SU1 clearly does more to preserve the well-being of the creature, it follows that, on the assumption that God loves all His creatures, SU1 is preferable to the doctrine of hell
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jack Mulder (2006). Must All Be Saved? A Kierkegaardian Response to Theological Universalism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 59 (1):1-24.
Andrew Jason Cohen (2000). On Universalism: Communitarians, Rorty, and (“Objectivist”) “Liberal Metaphysicians”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (1):39-75.
Gordon Knight (2006). Universalism for Open Theists. Religious Studies 42 (2):213-223.
Michael C. Rea (1998). In Defense of Mereological Universalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (2):347-360.
Michael J. Murray (1999). Three Versions of Universalism. Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):55-68.
Thomas Talbott (2001). Universalism and the Supposed Oddity of Our Earthly Life. Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):102-109.
Thomas Talbott (2001). Universalism and the Supposed Oddity of Our Earthly Life: Reply to Michael Murray. Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):102-109.
Daniel Howard-Snyder (2003). In Defense of Naïve Universalism. Faith and Philosophy 20 (3):345-363.
Jack Mulder Jr (2006). Must All Be Saved? A Kierkegaardian Response to Theological Universalism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 59 (1):1 - 24.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #180,112 of 1,096,701 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #105,642 of 1,096,701 )
How can I increase my downloads?