David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 144 (2):313 - 338 (2009)
How can abductive reasoning be physical, feasible, and reliable? This is Fodor’s riddle of abduction, and its apparent intractability is the cause of Fodor’s recent pessimism regarding the prospects for cognitive science. I argue that this riddle can be solved if we augment the computational theory of mind to allow for non-computational mental processes, such as those posited by classical associationists and contemporary connectionists. The resulting hybrid theory appeals to computational mechanisms to explain the semantic coherence of inference and associative mechanisms to explain the efficient retrieval of relevant information from memory. The interaction of these mechanisms explains how abduction can be physical, feasible, and reliable.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Lewis Carroll (1895). What the Tortoise Said to Achilles. Mind 4 (14):278-280.
Peter Carruthers (2003). On Fodor's Problem. Mind and Language 18 (5):502-523.
Noam Chomsky (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. The Mit Press.
Paul M. Churchland (1989). On the Nature of Theories: A Neurocomputational Perspective. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14:59--101.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Daniel G. Campos (2011). On the Distinction Between Peirce's Abduction and Lipton's Inference to the Best Explanation. Synthese 180 (3):419 - 442.
John Woods (2007). Ignorance and Semantic Tableaux: Aliseda on Abduction. Theoria 22 (3):305-318.
John Sutton (2001). Review of Jerry Fodor, the Mind DoesnT Work That Way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology. [REVIEW] Metapsychology 5 (7).
Sami Paavola (2006). Hansonian and Harmanian Abduction as Models of Discovery. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (1):93 – 108.
Cihua Xu & Hengwei Li (2011). Abduction and Metaphor: An Inquiry Into Common Cognitive Mechanism. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):480-491.
Lorenzo Magnani (2009). Abductive Cognition: The Epistemological and Eco-Cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning. Springer Verlag.
Woosuk Park (2012). Abduction and Estimation in Animals. Foundations of Science 17 (4):321-337.
Sami Paavola (2004). Abduction as a Logic and Methodology of Discovery: The Importance of Strategies. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 9 (3):267-283.
Steven Pinker (2005). So How Does the Mind Work? Mind and Language 20 (1):1-38.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads59 ( #25,822 of 1,101,027 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #177,033 of 1,101,027 )
How can I increase my downloads?