Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2):309-324 (2001)
|Abstract||Studies of animal culture have not normally included a consideration of cetaceans. However, with several long-term field studies now maturing, this situation should change. Animal culture is generally studied by either investigating transmission mechanisms experimentally, or observing patterns of behavioural variation in wild populations that cannot be explained by either genetic or environmental factors. Taking this second, ethnographic, approach, there is good evidence for cultural transmission in several cetacean species. However, only the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops) has been shown experimentally to possess sophisticated social learning abilities, including vocal and motor imitation; other species have not been studied. There is observational evidence for imitation and teaching in killer whales. For cetaceans and other large, wide-ranging animals, excessive reliance on experimental data for evidence of culture is not productive; we favour the ethnographic approach. The complex and stable vocal and behavioural cultures of sympatric groups of killer whales (Orcinus orca) appear to have no parallel outside humans, and represent an independent evolution of cultural faculties. The wide movements of cetaceans, the greater variability of the marine environment over large temporal scales relative to that on land, and the stable matrilineal social groups of some species are potentially important factors in the evolution of cetacean culture. There have been suggestions of gene-culture coevolution in cetaceans, and culture may be implicated in some unusual behavioural and life-history traits of whales and dolphins. We hope to stimulate discussion and research on culture in these animals|
|Keywords||Animal culture cetaceans coevolution cognition cultural transmission dolphins evolution of culture imitation teaching whales|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mark Wilson (2011). Of Whales and Pendulums: A Reply to Brandom. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (1):202-211.
Paola Cavalieri (2005). Rights for Whales? The Philosopher's Magazine (31):22-28.
James E. King (2003). Parsimonious Explanations and Wider Evolutionary Consequences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):347-348.
Morris Goldsmith & Asher Koriat (2003). Dolphins on the Witness Stand? The Comparative Psychology of Strategic Memory Regulation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):345-346.
Michael Philips (1998). Mary Midgley, Utopias, Dolphins, and Computers: Problems of Philosophical Plumbing:Utopias, Dolphins, and Computers: Problems of Philosophical Plumbing. Ethics 108 (4):813-814.
Mary Midgley (1996). Utopias, Dolphins, and Computers: Problems in Philosophical Plumbing. Routledge.
J. M. Siegel (2000). Phylogenetic Data Bearing on the Rem Sleep Learning Connection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):1007-1007.
Alain J.-P. C. Tschudin (2001). Getting at Animal Culture: The Interface of Experimental and Ethnographic Evidence in Dolphins. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2):357-358.
Thomas I. White (2000). Doing Business in Morally Troubled Waters. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):197-208.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #77,993 of 722,708 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,708 )
How can I increase my downloads?