David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Visual Cognition 7 (1-3):127-145 (2000)
When brief blank fields are placed between alternating displays of an original and a modified scene, a striking failure of perception is induced: the changes become extremely difficult to notice, even when they are large, presented repeatedly, and the observer expects them to occur (Rensink, O'Regan, & Clark, 1997). To determine the mechanisms behind this induced "change blindness", four experiments examine its dependence on initial preview and on the nature of the interruptions used. Results support the proposal that representations at the early stages of visual processing are highly volatile, and that focused attention is needed to stabilize them sufficiently to support the perception of change.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Bruno Berberian & Axel Cleeremans (2010). Endogenous Versus Exogenous Change: Change Detection, Self and Agency. Consciousness and Cognition 19 (1):198-214.
Yei-Yu Yeh & Cheng-Ta Yang (2009). Is a Pre-Change Object Representation Weakened Under Correct Detection of a Change?☆. Consciousness and Cognition 18 (1):91-102.
Similar books and articles
Ronald A. Rensink (2000). When Good Observers Go Bad: Change Blindness, Inattentional Blindness, and Visual Experience. [Journal (on-Line/Unpaginated)] 6 (9).
Daniel J. Simons, Christopher Chabris & Tatiana Schnur (2002). Evidence for Preserved Representations in Change Blindness. Consciousness and Cognition 11 (1):78-97.
Ronald A. Rensink (2002). Change Detection. Philosophical Explorations 53:245-277.
R. Rensink (2000). Visual Search for Change: A Probe Into the Nature of Attentional Processing. Visual Cognition 7:345-376.
Ronald A. Rensink (2005). Change Blindness. In Laurent Itti, Geraint Rees & John K. Tsotsos (eds.), Neurobiology of Attention. Academic Press. 76--81.
Ronald A. Rensink (2000). Seeing, Sensing, and Scrutinizing. Vision Research:469-1487.
Ronald A. Rensink, J. Kevin O'Regan & James J. Clark (1997). To See or Not to See: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes. Psychological Science 8:368-373.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads102 ( #11,878 of 1,100,036 )
Recent downloads (6 months)50 ( #1,736 of 1,100,036 )
How can I increase my downloads?