Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||When brief blank fields are placed between alternating displays of an original and a modified scene, a striking form of "change blindness" is induced, where the changes are difficult to see (Rensink, O'Regan, and Clark, 1997). Experiments are presented here examining the dependence of this phenomenon on initial preview and type of transient caused by the blanks. Results support the idea that our representation of the world is a sparse one, coordinated by attentional mechanisms.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Ronald A. Rensink (2000). When Good Observers Go Bad: Change Blindness, Inattentional Blindness, and Visual Experience. [Journal (on-Line/Unpaginated)] 6 (9).
Ronald A. Rensink (2002). Change Detection. 53:245-277.
Ronald A. Rensink (2000). Seeing, Sensing, and Scrutinizing. Vision Research:469-1487.
John A. Grimes (1996). On the Failure to Detect Changes in Scenes Across Saccades. In Kathleen Akins (ed.), Perception. Oxford University Press.
Daniel J. Simons, Christopher Chabris & Tatiana Schnur (2002). Evidence for Preserved Representations in Change Blindness. Consciousness And Cognition 11 (1):78-97.
Ronald A. Rensink (2000). The Dynamic Representation of Scenes. Visual Cognition.
Ronald A. Rensink, J. Kevin O'Regan & James J. Clark (1997). To See or Not to See: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes. Psychological Science 8:368-373.
Ronald A. Rensink, Kevin J. O'Regan & James J. Clark (2000). On Failures to Detect Changes in Scenes Across Brief Interruptions. Visual Cognition 7 (1-3):127-145.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #81,814 of 739,345 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,345 )
How can I increase my downloads?