David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 165 (2):225 - 245 (2008)
Dynamic Epistemic Logic (DEL) is the study of how to reason about knowledge, belief, and communication. This paper studies the relative expressivity of certain fragments of the DEL language for public and private communication. It is shown that the language of public communication with common knowledge and the language of private communication with common knowledge are expressively incomparable for the class of all pointed Kripke models, which provides a formal proof that public and private communication are fundamentally different in the presence of common knowledge. It is also shown that single-recipient private communication does not add expressive power to the language of modal logic with common knowledge for any class of transitive pointed Kripke models. The latter result provides a sense in which positive introspection—believing our own beliefs—induces a kind of self-dialog.
|Keywords||Dynamic epistemic logic Expressivity Private communication|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Patrick Blackburn, Maarten de Rijke & Yde Venema (2002). Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press.
Jan Plaza (2007). Logics of Public Communications. Synthese 158 (2):165 - 179.
Jaakko Hintikka (1962). Knowledge and Belief. Ithaca, N.Y.,Cornell University Press.
Hans van Ditmarsch, Wiebe van Der Hoek & Barteld Kooi (2008). Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Studia Logica 89 (3):441-445.
Citations of this work BETA
Bryan Renne (2012). Multi-Agent Justification Logic: Communication and Evidence Elimination. [REVIEW] Synthese 185 (S1):43-82.
Similar books and articles
Ruth G. Millikan (2003). In Defense of Public Language. In Louise M. Antony & H. Hornstein (eds.), Chomsky and His Critics. Blackwell
Antonio Villanacci & Ünal Zenginobuz, On the Neutrality of Redistribution in a General Equilibrium Model with Public Goods.
Hsin-I. Liu (2006). The Impossibility of the Public. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:119-124.
John A. Humphrey (1996). Kripke's Wittgenstein and the Impossibility of Private Language: The Same Old Story? Journal of Philosophical Research 21 (January):197-207.
Giuseppe Attardi & Maria Simi (1998). Communication Across Viewpoints. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (1):53-75.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #186,222 of 1,728,009 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #211,519 of 1,728,009 )
How can I increase my downloads?