The women radium dial painters as experimental subjects (1920–1990) or what counts as human experimentation
NTM International Journal of History and Ethics of Natural Sciences, Technology and Medicine 12 (4):233-248 (2004)
| Abstract | The case of women radium dial painters â women who tipped their brushes while painting the dials of watches and instruments with radioactive paint â has been extensively discussed in the medical and historical literature. Their painful and abhorrent deaths have occupied the interest of physicians, lawyers, politicians, military agencies, and the public. Hardly any discussion has concerned, however, the use of those women as experimental subjects in a number of epidemiological studies that took place from 1920 to 1990. This article addresses the neglected issue of human experimentation in relation to the radium dial painters. Although womenâs medical examinations have been classified as simple, routine measurements of radiation burden on the body and presented as a great offer to humanity, for more than fifty years those women had been repeatedly used as experimental subjects without proper consent. I argue that through this case it becomes obvious that the issue of defining what counts as human experimentation shifts from an epistemological to a serious ethical and political question, concerning the making of scientific knowledge while issues of gender related to this process are also discussed | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAnna C. Mastroianni, Ruth R. Faden & Daniel D. Federman (eds.) (1994). Women and Health Research: Ethical and Legal Issues of Including Women in Clinical Studies. National Academy Press.
Paul M. McNeill (1993). The Ethics and Politics of Human Experimentation. Cambridge University Press.
Philippe Amiel, Sverine Mathieu & Anne Fagot-Largeault (2001). Acculturating Human Experimentation: An Empirical Survey in France. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (3):285 – 298.
David N. Weisstub (ed.) (1998). Research on Human Subjects: Ethics, Law, and Social Policy. Pergamon.
Bradford H. Gray (1981). Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation: A Sociological Study of the Conduct and Regulation of Clinical Research. R.E. Krieger Pub. Co..
Paul Abraham Freund (1972). Experimentation with Human Subjects. London,Allen and Unwin.
Adil E. Shamoo (2009). Responsible Conduct of Research. Oxford University Press.
M. Mellor (2000). Feminism and Environmental Ethics A Materialist Perspective. Ethics and the Environment 5 (1):107-123.
LeRoy Walters (1974). Ethical Issues in Experimentation on the Human Fetus. Journal of Religious Ethics 2 (1):33 - 54.
Ursula Klein (2005). Experiments at the Intersection of Experimental History, Technological Inquiry, and Conceptually Driven Analysis: A Case Study From Early Nineteenth-Century France. Perspectives on Science 13 (1):1-48.
William A. Silverman (1985). Human Experimentation: A Guided Step Into the Unknown. Oxford University Press.
Alice Adams (2004). Of Rats and Women: Fetal Sexuality and Hybrid Agency. Journal of Medical Humanities 25 (3):205-221.
Maria Trumpler (1997). Verification and Variation: Patterns of Experimentation in Investigations of Galvanism in Germany, 1790-1800. Philosophy of Science 64 (4):84.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-01Total downloads5 ( #160,239 of 549,037 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
