Journal of Business Ethics 46 (4):319 - 335 (2003)
|Abstract||This essay reviews six different approaches to intellectual property. It and argues that none of these accounts provide an adequate justification of intellectual property laws and policies because (1) there are many different types of intellectual property, and (2) a variety of incommensurable values play a role in the justification of intellectual property. The best approach to intellectual property is to assess and balance competing moral values in light of the particular facts and circumstances.|
|Keywords||Hegel intellectual property justice Locke pluralism privacy utilitarianism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rivka Amado & Nevin M. Gewertz (2004). Intellectual Property and the Pharmaceutical Industry: A Moral Crossroads Between Health and Property. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 55 (3):295 - 308.
Simon Butt & Timothy Lindsey, Trips, Intellectual Property Law Reform in Indonesia: Why Injunctions Aren't Stopping Piracy.
John Snapper (1991). The Uses and Justifications for the Regulation of Intellectual Property. Social Epistemology 5 (1):78 – 87.
Francis Gurry (2005). The Growing Complexity of International Policy in Intellectual Property. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):13-20.
Lisa Geller (2010). Data Management in Academic Settings: An Intellectual Property Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):769-775.
James Wilson (2009). Could There Be a Right to Own Intellectual Property? Law and Philosophy 28 (4):393 - 427.
Paul Steidlmeier (1993). The Moral Legitimacy of Intellectual Property Claims: American Business and Developing Country Perspectives. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 12 (2):157 - 164.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads62 ( #18,282 of 722,862 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,028 of 722,862 )
How can I increase my downloads?