American Journal of Bioethics 11 (10):17 - 21 (2011)
|Abstract||Multiple authorship is becoming increasingly common in bioethics research. There are well-established criteria for authorship in empirical bioethics research but not for conceptual research. It is important to develop criteria for authorship in conceptual publications to prevent undeserved authorship and uphold standards of fairness and accountability. This article explores the issue of multiple authorship in bioethics and develops criteria for determining who should be an author on a conceptual publication in bioethics. Authorship in conceptual research should be based on contributing substantially to: (1) identifying a topic, problem, or issue to study; (2) reviewing and interpreting the relevant literature; (3) formulating, analyzing, and evaluating arguments that support one or more theses; (4) responding to objections and counterarguments; and (5) drafting the manuscript and approving the final version. Authors of conceptual publications should participate substantially in at least two of areas (1)?(5)|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Barton Moffatt (2011). Responsible Authorship: Why Researchers Must Forgo Honorary Authorship. Accountability in Research 18 (2):76-90.
Matko Marušić, Jadranka Božikov, Vedran Katavić, Darko Hren, Marko Kljaković-Gašpić & Ana Marušić (2004). Authorship in a Small Medical Journal: A Study of Contributorship Statements by Corresponding Authors. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (3):493-502.
Thomas Erren, Michael Erren & David Shaw (2013). Peer Reviewers Can Meet Journals’ Criteria for Authorship. British Medical Journal 346:f166.
Anne Hudson Jones (2003). Can Authorship Policies Help Prevent Scientific Misconduct? What Role for Scientific Societies? Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):243-256.
Mahsa Ghajarzadeh (2012). Guest Authors in An Iranian Journal. Developing World Bioethics 12 (3).
Joost P. H. Drenth (1996). Proliferation of Authors on Research Reports in Medicine. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4).
David Shaw (2011). The Authorless Paper: The ICMJE’s Definition of Authorship is Illogical and Unethical. British Medical Journal 343 (7831):999.
Eugen Tarnow (1999). The Authorship List in Science: Junior Physicists' Perceptions of Who Appears and Why. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1).
D. Gareth Jones (2011). Is Multiple Authorship in Conceptual Bioethics Ethically Sustainable? American Journal of Bioethics 11 (10):30 - 32.
Jason J. Washburn (2008). Encouraging Research Collaboration Through Ethical and Fair Authorship: A Model Policy. Ethics and Behavior 18 (1):44 – 58.
G. J. Dorleijn, Ralf Grüttemeier & Liesbeth Korthals Altes (eds.) (2010). Authorship Revisited: Conceptions of Authorship Around 1900 and 2000. Peeters.
Robyn J. Geelhoed, Julia C. Phillips, Ann R. Fischer, Elaine Shpungin & Younnjung Gong (2007). Authorship Decision Making: An Empirical Investigation. Ethics and Behavior 17 (2):95 – 115.
Sarah E. Oberlander & Robert J. Spencer (2006). Graduate Students and the Culture of Authorship. Ethics and Behavior 16 (3):217 – 232.
Mary Rose & Karla Fischer (1995). Policies and Perspectives on Authorship. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4).
Barton Moffatt (2011). How Authorship Guidelines in Bioethics Can Ensure Fairness and Accountability. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (10):26 - 27.
Added to index2011-09-27
Total downloads5 ( #160,204 of 549,005 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 549,005 )
How can I increase my downloads?