|Abstract||I do know that a lot of ideas that seemed o the wall when I rst encountered them years ago now seem pretty sensible. One example that our commentators don't mention is relevance logic; there are a lot of themes in that literature that bear on the themes we mention. Barwise and Perry 1985.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Simon D.’Alfonso (forthcoming). The Logic of Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Minds and Machines:1-19.
Jan van Eijck & Fer-Jan de Vries (1995). Reasoning About Update Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (1).
Greg Restall (1998). Displaying and Deciding Substructural Logics 1: Logics with Contraposition. Journal of Philosophical Logic 27 (2):179-216.
Greg Restall (1993). Simplified Semantics for Relevant Logics (and Some of Their Rivals). Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (5):481 - 511.
Ewa Orlowska (1992). Relational Proof System for Relevant Logics. Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1425-1440.
Greg Restall (1994). Subintuitionistic Logics. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (1):116-129.
Luciano Floridi (2008). Understanding Epistemic Relevance. Erkenntnis 69 (1):69 - 92.
Jan Van Eijck & Fer-Jan De Vries (1995). Reasoning About Update Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (1):19 - 45.
Greg Restall (1995). Four-Valued Semantics for Relevant Logics (and Some of Their Rivals). Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (2):139 - 160.
Norihiro Kamide (2002). Kripke Semantics for Modal Substructural Logics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (4):453-470.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads11 ( #99,523 of 549,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,333 of 549,088 )
How can I increase my downloads?