|Abstract||Can desirable ends justify what would otherwise be undesirable means? The answers to this question depends on a variety of factors, including the ends to be accomplished, the means to be employed, the person who would use them, and the parties against whom they would be directed. This article begins by discussing American rules regarding lying by lawyers. The article argues that those rules place insufficient importance on the protection of innocents, have a corrosive effect on the moral values of lawyers who obey them and alienate lawyers who disobey them. The article then examines the Jewish law approach which, by contrast to secular law, eschews role-differentiated ethics and requires more contextual, nuanced decisionmaking. Finally, the article explores whether the Jewish law rules would provide useful guidance for revision of America's secular legal ethics laws.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Moshe Koppel (1996). Meta-Halakhah: Logic, Intuition and the Unfolding of Jewish Law. Jason Aronson.
Louis Jacobs (2000). A Tree of Life: Diversity, Flexibility, and Creativity in Jewish Law. Littman Library of Jewish Civilization.
Warren Goldstein (2006). Defending the Human Spirit: Jewish Law's Vision for a Moral Society. Feldheim.
Louis E. Newman (1993). Talking Ethics with Strangers: A View From Jewish Tradition. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (6):549-567.
Simon Greenberg (1977). The Ethical in the Jewish and American Heritage. Distributed by Ktav Pub. House.
Elliot N. Dorff (2007). For the Love of God and People: A Philosophy of Jewish Law. The Jewish Publication Society.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #274,556 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?