Graduate studies at Western
Episteme 2 (3):135-147 (2005)
|Abstract||Openness is one of the most important principles in scientifi c inquiry, but there are many good reasons for maintaining secrecy in research, ranging from the desire to protect priority, credit, and intellectual property, to the need to safeguard the privacy of research participants or minimize threats to national or international security. This article examines the clash between openness and secrecy in science in light of some recent developments in information technology, business, and politics, and makes some practical suggestions for resolving confl icts between openness and secrecy|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
P. Dear (2003). The Ideology of Modern Science - Openness, Secrecy, Authorship: Technical Arts and the Culture of Knowledge From Antiquity to the Renaissance Pamela O. Long; the Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, 2001, Pp. XII+364, Price £38.00 Hardback, ISBN 0-8018-6606-. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (4):821-828.
Mark N. Wexler (1987). Conjectures on the Dynamics of Secrecy and the Secrets Business. Journal of Business Ethics 6 (6):469 - 480.
Michael G. F. Martin (2001). Epistemic Openness and Perceptual Defeasibility. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (2):441-448.
A. Kessel & Michael J. Crawford (1997). Openness with Patients: A Categorical Imperative to Correct an Imbalance. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3).
Victor Pompa (1992). Managerial Secrecy: An Ethical Examination. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):147 - 156.
Steven A. Walton (2004). Openness, Secrecy, and Authorship: Technical Arts and the Culture of Knowledge From Antiquity to the Renaissance (Review). Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 47 (2):310-312.
Agnes S. Ku (1998). Boundary Politics in the Public Sphere: Openness, Secrecy, and Leak. Sociological Theory 16 (2):172-192.
Christian Munthe & Stellan Welin (1996). The Morality of Scientific Openness. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):411-428.
Steve McMillan, Ronald Duska, Robert Hamilton & Debra Casey (2006). The Ethical Dilemma of Research and Development Openness Versus Secrecy. Journal of Business Ethics 65 (3):279 - 285.
Added to index2010-07-11
Total downloads10 ( #114,557 of 740,358 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,358 )
How can I increase my downloads?