David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Brain and Mind 1 (2):193-207 (2000)
This paper develops an instrumentalistic argumentagainst an eliminativist approach to using the folkconcept of pain in clinical medicine and draws someimplications for biomedical theories of pain. Thepaper argues that the folk concept of pain plays afundamental role in several aspects of clinicalmedicine, including the diagnosis and treatment ofdiseases and symptoms, relieving human suffering, andthe doctor-patient relationship. Since clinicians mustbe able to apply biomedical theories of pain inmedical practice, these theories should not stray toofar from pain's clinical realities. Biomedicaltheories of pain should at least incorporate an analogof the folk concept of pain, even if this concept isrevised in light of scientific advances
|Keywords||Biomedicine Folk Psychology Pain Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Terry Dartnall (2001). The Pain Problem. Philosophical Psychology 14 (1):95-102.
C. R. Chapman, Y. Nakakura & C. N. Chapman (2000). Pain and Folk Theory. Brain and Mind 1 (2):209-222.
Nikola Grahek (1991). Objective and Subjective Aspects of Pain. Philosophical Psychology 4 (2):249-66.
David B. Resnik & Marsha Rehm (2001). The Undertreatment of Pain: Scientific, Clinical, Cultural, and Philosophical Factors. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (3):277-288.
Charles Sayward (2004). Malcolm on Criteria. Behavior and Philosophy 32 (2):349-358.
Ian Ravenscroft, Folk Psychology as a Theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Murat Aydede (2005). Introduction: A Critical and Quasi-Historical Essay on Theories of Pain. In Pain: New Essays on its Nature and the Methodology of its Study. Cambridge Ma: Bradford Book/MIT Press
Donald F. Gustafson (1998). Pain, Qualia, and the Explanatory Gap. Philosophical Psychology 11 (3):371-387.
Donald F. Gustafson (2000). On the Supposed Utility of a Folk Theory of Pain. Brain and Mind 1 (2):223-228.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #106,512 of 1,725,157 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #81,204 of 1,725,157 )
How can I increase my downloads?