Russell's structuralism and the supposed death of computational cognitive science
Minds and Machines 19 (2):181-197 (2009)
| Abstract | John Searle believes that computational properties are purely formal and that consequently, computational properties are not intrinsic, empirically discoverable, nor causal; and therefore, that an entity’s having certain computational properties could not be sufficient for its having certain mental properties. To make his case, Searle employs an argument that had been used before him by Max Newman, against Russell’s structuralism; one that Russell himself considered fatal to his own position. This paper formulates a not-so-explored version of Searle’s problem with computational cognitive science, and refutes it by suggesting how our understanding of computation is far from implying the structuralism Searle vitally attributes to it. On the way, I formulate and argue for a thesis that strengthens Newman’s case against Russell’s structuralism, and thus raises the apparent risk for computational cognitive science too. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Computation Multiple realizability Strong AI Structuralism Searle Russell Truth | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRicardo Restrepo Echavarria (2009). Russell's Structuralism and the Supposed Death of Computational Cognitive Science. Minds and Machines 19 (2).
Ricardo Restrepo Echavarria (2009). Russell's Structuralism and the Supposed Death of Computational Cognitive Science. Minds and Machines 19 (2):181-197.
Michael Rescorla (forthcoming). Against Structuralist Theories of Computational Implementation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Stuart S. Glennan (1995). Computationalism and the Problem of Other Minds. Philosophical Psychology 8 (4):375-88.
Matthew Stuart Piper (2012). You Can't Eat Causal Cake with an Abstract Fork: An Argument Against Computational Theories of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 19 (11-12):154-90.
David J. Chalmers (2011). A Computational Foundation for the Study of Cognition. Journal of Cognitive Science 12 (4):323-357.
Amir Horowitz (2007). Computation, External Factors, and Cognitive Explanations. Philosophical Psychology 20 (1):65-80.
David J. Chalmers (1994). On Implementing a Computation. Minds and Machines 4 (4):391-402.
W. Demopolous & Michael Friedman (1989). The Concept of Structure in Russell's The Analysis of Matter. In C. Wade Savage & C. Anthony Anderson (eds.), Rereading Russell: Essays in Bertrand Russell's Metaphysics and Epistemology. University of Minnesota Press.
Mike Fuller (1996). Puppets and Pebbles and Ripples and Strings: Structuralism and Post-Structuralism Contrasted. Cogito 10 (1):49-55.
Paul R. Thagard (2002). How Molecules Matter to Mental Computation. Philosophy of Science 69 (3):497-518.
M. H. A. Newman (1928). Mr. Russell's Causal Theory of Perception. Mind 5 (146):26-43.
Marcin Miłkowski (2011). Beyond Formal Structure: A Mechanistic Perspective on Computation and Implementation. Journal of Cognitive Science 12 (4):359-379.
Itay Shani (2005). Computation and Intentionality: A Recipe for Epistemic Impasse. Minds and Machines 15 (2):207-228.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2012-02-04Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
